Hi Jim,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Jim Gibson wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2013, at 8:22 PM, budi pearl wrote:
>
>
> Why do you want to reduce your CPU usage?
>
> That may seem like a silly question (who wouldn't want to reduce their CPU
> usage), but the answer to
Hi All,
Is there any way to reduce the processor usage by perl?
I am trying to use nice -19 but proc usage is still 100%
Tasks: 189 total, 2 running, 187 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.5%sy, 26.0%ni, 73.5%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 4042684k total, 34635
Hi Jim,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Jim Gibson wrote:
> OR
>
> print_path( $id, $routes->{$id} );
> ...
> sub print_path
> {
> ...
> while( my ($start, $end) = each %$edges ) {
>
>
This is what i want, thank you!
Apparently passing "$routes->{$id}" is my earlier issue.
--budi
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:05 AM, budi pearl wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> When trying to accessed inside subroutine , i got:
>
> Type of arg 1 to each must be hash (not hash element) at ./print_path.plline
> 41, near "}) "
>
> Execution of ./print_path.pl aborted due
}}) {
but this not:
while (my ($start, $end) = each %{$edges{$label}}) {
Thanks.
--budhi
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:33:02 +0700
> budi pearl wrote:
>
> > my $id = "ROUTE-252";
> > print Dumper $routes{$id
Hi All,
I would like to pass hash: %{$routes{"ROUTE-252"}} instead of %routes but
got this error:
[budi@dev bin]$ ./print_path.pl
Type of arg 1 to each must be hash (not hash element) at
./print_path.plline 38, near "}) "
Execution of ./print_path.pl aborted due to compilation errors.
#use
Hi Rob,
This works and looks much more simpler. Thanks, i love it.
--budhi
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Rob Dixon wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 10:01, budi perl wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have this following hash:
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/perl
>> #
>> use strict;
>> use Data::Dumper;
>>
>> my %MYROUTES = (
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:19 PM, David Precious wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:01:43 +0700
> budi perl wrote:
> You can't have the same hash key twice; you've duplicated 427 there.
>
> Also, you don't need to quote the left side of a fat comma, so you can
> just as easily say e.g. ABEP => 441.
>
