Re: PCRE: Use backreference in pattern repetition bracket

2011-08-25 Thread Honza Mach
Hi, On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:54 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:02:37PM +0200, Honza Mach wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:35 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > > > say "extracted: ", /^(\d+\s+.{$len})/ if

Re: PCRE: Use backreference in pattern repetition bracket

2011-08-25 Thread Honza Mach
Hi, On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:35 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:42:20 +0200 > > > Honza Mach wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > I was wondering, if it is possible to use ba

Re: PCRE: Use backreference in pattern repetition bracket

2011-08-25 Thread Honza Mach
Hi Schlomi, thank you so much for such a quick response. On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:56 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > ׁHi Honza, > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:42:20 +0200 > Honza Mach wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I was wondering, if it is possible to

PCRE: Use backreference in pattern repetition bracket

2011-08-25 Thread Honza Mach
oing something wrong?). Is there other solution to my problem. Than you in advance for your time Regards Honza Mach Cesnet smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: socketpair - problem communicating to multiple subprocesses

2011-06-06 Thread Honza Mach
Thank you for your help. Regards Honza Mach On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 13:09 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > >>>>> "HM" == Honza Mach writes: > > HM> my ($child, $parent); > > HM> foreach my $i (1..3) > HM> { > HM> socketpai

socketpair - problem communicating to multiple subprocesses

2011-06-05 Thread Honza Mach
the pipe function does not create new pair of handles each call. Does anyone know, what am I doing wrong, what am I missing? What is the correct way to establish communication with multiple subprocesses? I really need to get this working somehow. If needed, I will gladly provide more informa