so it needs to be untainted it before being fed into "use
lib" (or other adjustment to '@INC').
--
: David Lee
: ECMWF (Data Handling System)
: Shinfield Park
: Reading RG2 9AX
: Berkshire
:
: tel:+44-118-9499 362
: email: david@ecmwf.int
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: begi
? I don't see any in "Programming Perl (3rd edition)", nor
in web searches. (While I suspect that relocating the "MODULE::NAME"
items to be within the each system's perl installation (site/vendor
etc.) might possibly work, there may be local administrative resistance
Philip Potter wrote:
2009/11/4 David Lee :
[...]
Anyway, your explanation was useful and gives us sufficient to decide how to
address our local use of these numbers. (In our case, they are
human-oriented accumulated byte-counts, for which we don't actually need
that significance/prec
to address our local use of these numbers. (In our case, they are
human-oriented accumulated byte-counts, for which we don't actually need
that significance/precision.)
Thanks.
--
: David Lee
: ECMWF (Data Handling System)
: Shinfield Park
: Reading RG2 9AX
: Berkshire
:
: tel:+44-1
n exercise for the reader!)
I'm not aware of any documentation about this surprise. Is this a
program bug or a documentation bug? (Or a self bug?)
Is there a more appropriate forum than "beginn...@..." to raise this?
--
: David Lee
: ECMWF (Data Handling System)
: Shinfield