On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:33:14AM -0800, drieux wrote:
> So let us step back and look at the 'root cause problem'
>
> so I want to just 'fix it on the fly'
>
> and yes, foo.pl as an editable text file will allow you
> simply open it with a text editor and WHACK a fix in. Unlike
> RealCode[
> >What kind of naming structure would you suggest for people who just
> >want
> >to use extensions for organizational purposes?
>
> when you say for 'organizational purposes' do you
> mean in terms of tracking the 'source code' in a
> source code control system? Or do you mean tracking
> named a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:55:24PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Rob> Perl programs conventionally go in *.pl files.
>
> No. Only on broken architectures that demand it (read: "windows").
> On Unix, Perl programs have no extension, any more than "cat" has an
> extension. Why should the user
