Re: How does opendir/readdir process files

2015-01-13 Thread Brandon McCaig
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:40:46PM -0500, Brandon McCaig wrote: > to spend some quality time with The Revelant Manuals (TFM). I cite this as proof that I am TFT (too fucking tired). I'm not going to confess how proud I was of this word play before I realized that it was completely nonsensical. -t

Re: How does opendir/readdir process files

2015-01-13 Thread Brandon McCaig
Harry: (Expect typographical errors in such a long post...) tl;dr? RTFM. On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 08:26:55PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > I'm taxing peoples patience I suppose but being considerably thick of > skull I cannot just look at this and see what it does. > > > my @files = map { $_->[0]

Re: How does opendir/readdir process files

2015-01-13 Thread Charles DeRykus
> ... > I think the normal and original behavior is no reference. I think > they added the reference in 5.14 too. Perhaps the documentation > just fails to mention that support for arrays was added in 5.14 > along with references? Hopefully I got that right this time. :) > Ah, RTFM would've helped

Re: Back to work on perl + gui + hebrew...

2015-01-13 Thread D.Edmons
Thanks for the link. I'm still reading. Very good info! Dale On 01/12/2015 05:10 PM, Shawn H Corey wrote: On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:23:53 +0200 Shlomi Fish wrote: Actually, Perl/Qt and Perl/KDE should also support Hebrew, Bidirectionality, and internationalisation well. Maybe wxPerl too (not

Re: Back to work on perl + gui + hebrew...

2015-01-13 Thread D.Edmons
I took a look at the link, it looks okay. I'd have to check into Wx more. It seems I used it a long time back with ruby? Thanks On 01/12/2015 05:10 PM, Shawn H Corey wrote: On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:23:53 +0200 Shlomi Fish wrote: Actually, Perl/Qt and Perl/KDE should also support Hebrew, Bi

Re: How does opendir/readdir process files

2015-01-13 Thread Brandon McCaig
Charles: On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 11:02:28AM -0800, Charles DeRykus wrote: > Definitely needs a 'use 5.014' if you want to dabble. You appear to be correct. Hmmm, I didn't figure that from the documentation. Either I read it wrong or it's not documented well. > Apparently undocumented that you