Since this is a shadow copy, I don't think the first array will be
deleted completely. Isn't it?
The second option creates the same array and populates it, but then
copies it to another anonymous array, deletes the first array, and
returns a reference to the copy.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 18/08/2014 09:17, Ken Peng wrote:
sub myfunc {
my @x=(1,2,3);
return \@x;
}
# or,
sub myfunc {
my @x=(1,2,3);
return [@x];
}
which one is the better way to return the list content? And if the
method is an instance method?
The first version of the subroutine is the best choice
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:13:13 +0200
lee wrote:
> Shawn H Corey writes:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:17:53 +0800
> > Ken Peng wrote:
> >
> >> sub myfunc {
> >> my @x=(1,2,3);
> >> return \@x;
> >> }
> >>
> >> # or,
> >>
> >> sub myfunc {
> >> my @x=(1,2,3);
> >> return [@x];
> >> }
> >
On Sep 8, 2014, at 3:13 PM, lee wrote:
> Shawn H Corey writes:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:17:53 +0800
>> Ken Peng wrote:
>>
>>> sub myfunc {
>>> my @x=(1,2,3);
>>> return \@x;
>>> }
>>>
>>> # or,
>>>
>>> sub myfunc {
>>> my @x=(1,2,3);
>>> return [@x];
>>> }
>>
>> # or
>>
>> sub myfu
Shawn H Corey writes:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:17:53 +0800
> Ken Peng wrote:
>
>> sub myfunc {
>> my @x=(1,2,3);
>> return \@x;
>> }
>>
>> # or,
>>
>> sub myfunc {
>> my @x=(1,2,3);
>> return [@x];
>> }
>
> # or
>
> sub myfunc {
> return [ 1, 2, 3 ];
> }
Is there a difference to
su
Chris Knipe writes:
> This is an actual example of a communication stream between a client
> and the perl server, the socket is already established, and
> communication is flowing between the two parties. [C] indicates what
> the client is sending to the server, and [S] indicates the responses
>
