发自我的小米手机
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Charles DeRykus wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Charles DeRykus wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
>>>
I'm currently loading some new servers with CentOS6
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Charles DeRykus wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
>>
>>> I'm currently loading some new servers with CentOS6 on which perl5.10 is
>>> the standard version of perl provided. Howe
I'm helping someone retrieve some info from a MySQL db and I'm having
trouble sending multiple select statements with Perl. Here's a portion of the
code:
use SQL::SplitStatement;
my $query_4 = "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE `temp_ip` AS
(SELECT `ip`
FROM `ip_addresses` "
.$daily.
" AND TRIM
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Charles DeRykus wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
>
>> I'm currently loading some new servers with CentOS6 on which perl5.10 is
>> the standard version of perl provided. However, I've also loaded perl5.18
>> and I don't think the vers
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
> I'm currently loading some new servers with CentOS6 on which perl5.10 is
> the standard version of perl provided. However, I've also loaded perl5.18
> and I don't think the version of perl is significant in the results I'm
> seeing. Basically,
I'm currently loading some new servers with CentOS6 on which perl5.10 is
the standard version of perl provided. However, I've also loaded perl5.18
and I don't think the version of perl is significant in the results I'm
seeing. Basically, I'm seeing perl performance significantly slower on my
new sy
Hi Brian,
Very nicely explained. I suppose Perl Beginners is not the best forum for
this question. I clearly didn't understand the various ways to use prove.
Thanks,
--Marc
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Brian Fraser wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Marc Perry wrote:
>
>> Has