On 09/24/13 00:12, Dr.Ruud wrote:
I assume this is about paths and filenames. Have you considered an rsync
dry-run?
I use "rsync -n ..." frequently.
I also assume that you want to communicate as little as possible, so you
don't have supersets of all strings on all sides. (or it would become
From: Andy Bach
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Shawn H Corey wrote:
There is also a third group who want to get rid of sigils entirely. ;)
Ahhh! Blasphemy, Blasphemer! That way lies chaos! Dogs and cats, living
together! NEVER!
... And I was going to add that there is a four
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Andy Bach wrote:
> Did you read the exegesis? Damian is one of the smartest guys you'll ever
> hear speak (his book "Perl Best Practices", for one, is worth it's weight in
> classrooms - er, something like that). It's not that you're wrong or that
> the argument
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Shawn H Corey wrote:
>
> There is also a third group who want to get rid of sigils entirely. ;)
>
Ahhh! Blasphemy, Blasphemer! That way lies chaos! Dogs and cats, living
together! NEVER!
Er, sorry. As the exegesis are deprecated (though still worth the reads
jus
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:27:24 -0500
Andy Bach wrote:
> Did you read the exegesis? Damian is one of the smartest guys you'll
> ever hear speak (his book "Perl Best Practices", for one, is worth
> it's weight in classrooms - er, something like that).
Perl::Critic and its script, perlcritic, follow
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> The way in use in script below works... quotations around "@_", so the
> content is passed rather than the element count. And the ways that
> are commented out also work.
>
Yeah, that's a bit of a fragile idiom - inside dbl quotes, arrays a
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> What I don't understand here is why we have to keep the true
> sigil for any access.
>
Did you read the exegesis? Damian is one of the smartest guys you'll ever
hear speak (his book "Perl Best Practices", for one, is worth it's weight
in cla
See below, please.
On 09/24/2013 09:23 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Somehow I had it my mind that perl would recognize an incoming
variable to a sub routine like:
sub test($var)
As $_ if there was only one element to @_,
But I see from testing that, no, not true.
These three methods below a
Somehow I had it my mind that perl would recognize an incoming
variable to a sub routine like:
sub test($var)
As $_ if there was only one element to @_,
But I see from testing that, no, not true.
These three methods below all
work. Perhaps there are others.
if ( -f "@_" )
(my $fname) =
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Andy Bach wrote:
> I liked it, after I
> understood it.
I posted the question for the same reason: I believe that having the
sigil meaning what you (are thinking) you are accessing was a great
idea. What I don't understand here is why we have to keep the true
sig
On 24/09/2013 00:17, David Christensen wrote:
I'm looking for a hash function and a related function or operator such
that:
H(string1 . string2) = f(H(string1), H(string2))
H(string1 . string2) = H(string1) op H(string2)
where:
H() is the hash function
string1 i
11 matches
Mail list logo
