Hi boB,
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 18:49:26 -0600
boB Stepp wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, timothy adigun <2teezp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Ofcourse, one can argue that there is nothing wrong with that. But I
> > think is not "RIGHT" to just discard the output return by the backtick
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:49 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
>>
>> system("chcp 65001>nil");# this works for me Using OS Win 7 32bits
>>
>>> > binmode STDOUT, ":encoding(UTF-8)";
>>> > print "\x{03B1}\x{03C9}\n";
>
> This works for me as well. Thanks, Tim and Charles!
>
I spoke too soon! The above as w
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, timothy adigun <2teezp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Ofcourse, one can argue that there is nothing wrong with that. But I
> think is not "RIGHT" to just discard the output return by the backtick in a
> void context.
> In that light I concur with Charles DeRykus, that
