On 2012-02-26 23:55, Rob Dixon wrote:
On 27/02/2012 02:30, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I know this isn't a beginner's question, but I know there are geniuses
here. Is there a way to simplify this within Perl?
Hi Steve
Much of the complexity comes from working with the nested data
structure. Writi
On 27/02/2012 02:30, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I came across a question early this morning on a forum that intrigued
me. I literally spent about five hours trying everything to solve it,
but I couldn't.
Every attempt at recursion, counting, numbering, hashing etc failed. Is
there a way to use recurs
On 2012-02-26 21:52, Shawn H Corey wrote:
On 12-02-26 09:30 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I know this isn't a beginner's question, but I know there are geniuses
here. Is there a way to simplify this within Perl?
There is no simplify way of doing this. Separate off the first attribute
and cross-pro
On 2012-02-26 21:52, Shawn H Corey wrote:
On 12-02-26 09:30 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I know this isn't a beginner's question, but I know there are geniuses
here. Is there a way to simplify this within Perl?
There is no simplify way of doing this. Separate off the first attribute
and cross-pro
On 12-02-26 09:30 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I know this isn't a beginner's question, but I know there are geniuses
here. Is there a way to simplify this within Perl?
There is no simplify way of doing this. Separate off the first attribute
and cross-product it with a recursive call to the rest.
I came across a question early this morning on a forum that intrigued
me. I literally spent about five hours trying everything to solve it,
but I couldn't.
Every attempt at recursion, counting, numbering, hashing etc failed. Is
there a way to use recursion to eliminate the repeated and
pre-ca
Hi,
I want to run a shell command with the following constraints:
a. I like to get the return code of the command
b. Furthermore I want to combine stdout and stderr so that the output
comes in a natural sequence like in the shell.
c. I don't want to capture the output in a variable (because the ou
Hi Rob,
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:43:15 +
Rob Dixon wrote:
> On 25/02/2012 19:24, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I had a look at remove_tree from File::Path.
> >
> > Let us say I have a directory: ./a/b/c/d
> >
> > When I do
> >
> > remove_tree('./a',
> > {
> >verbose => 1
> >
