From: "Octavian Rasnita"
> From: "Jenda Krynicky"
> >> There was a period when it was OK to follow that old netiquette
> >> that said that bottom-posting is the good way, but now it isn't.
> >
> > Because you said so?
>
> Yes. Me and many others.
>
> I bottom post (on Perl - related mailing li
From: "Jenda Krynicky"
>> And by the way, there was a period when it was OK to say words like "black"
>> but now it isn't.
...
>
> And it was a much better period. Fuck newspeak and fuck political
> correctness. Rose, the same as shit, under any other name would smell
Better for who? For yo
People. Go -f>@+?*<.-&'_:$#/%! yourselves. How about some more Perl, and a
lot less fucking drama?
At least be original (or copypaste from Stack Overflow[0]) and do this on
topic, folks.
By the way, happy new year!
[0]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/234075/what-is-your-best-programmer-joke/2
From: "Octavian Rasnita"
> This answer is very good for "Top posts don't bother me as much as
> those who don't trim the quotes." also. :-) When top-posting, the
> advantage is that it is not important how many messages remain at the
> bottom, exactly because nobody reads what's
On 11-01-01 10:06 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
This answer is very good for "Top posts don't bother me as much as those who don't
trim the quotes." also.:-)
When top-posting, the advantage is that it is not important how many messages
remain at the bottom, exactly because nobody reads what's be
From: "Shawn H Corey"
> On 10-12-31 10:58 PM, jeff pang wrote:
>> Another problem:
>> Shawn your signature message is too long to read.:)
>>
>> Regards.
>
> Doesn't matter; nobody reads those things anyway. :)
This answer is very good for "Top posts don't bother me as much as those who
don't
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 03:32, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> "RW" == Raymond Wan writes:
> RW> Saying the other tutorials are garbage is quite harsh and a bit
> RW> disrespectful to the authors who presumably meant well and didn't do
> RW> it to sabotage Perl's reputation. Maybe they aren't helpfu
On 10-12-31 10:58 PM, jeff pang wrote:
Another problem:
Shawn your signature message is too long to read.:)
Regards.
Doesn't matter; nobody reads those things anyway. :)
--
Just my 0.0002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
Confusion is the first step of understanding.
Programming is as m
On 01/01/2011 11:21, perl wrote:
Can any one tell why isn't this working on HTML::Tree ??
use strict;
use strict;
use warnings;
use YAML;
use HTML::Tree;
use LWP::UserAgent;
my $ua = LWP::UserAgent->new;
my $response =
$ua->get('http://www.raaga.com/channels/hindi/moviedetail.asp?mid=H002927');
use strict;
use warnings;
use YAML;
use HTML::Tree;
use LWP::UserAgent;
my $ua = LWP::UserAgent->new;
my $response =
$ua->get('http://www.raaga.com/channels/hindi/moviedetail.asp?mid=H002927');
my $content1 = $response->content;
my $tree = HTML::Tree->new();
$tree->parse($content1);
my $article = $
Hi Parag,
CCing the list.
On Monday 27 Dec 2010 22:33:08 Parag Kalra wrote:
> Hi Shlomi,
>
> Really nice article. Very informative indeed. Keep the good work and I
> really appreciate your efforts and contribution towards OpenSource.
I'm glad you like it. ( And it's not "OpenSource" but "open s
11 matches
Mail list logo
