On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:06 +1000, Dave Tang wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:58:24 +1000, 120 wrote:
>
> > Apologies for my error - if I may point out that sending 'off list'
> > replies is also equally rude.
>
> May I ask about this netiquette? I usually thank people who have helped me
> "off
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:58:24 +1000, 120 wrote:
Apologies for my error - if I may point out that sending 'off list'
replies is also equally rude.
May I ask about this netiquette? I usually thank people who have helped me
"off list", as I don't like to clog everyone's email with my thank you
Bryan R Harris wrote:
John W. Krahn wrote:
Bryan R Harris wrote:
"print+(eval)[-1]"??? What's the "+" for? You're amazing, John.
The "+" is so that you don't get a syntax error because "print(eval)"
with "[-1]" after it is nonsensical. BTW, why are you using a list
slice anyway? Won't
Hi Bryan.
On Sunday 21 Feb 2010 18:11:26 Bryan R Harris wrote:
> > Thanks for not top-posting and for following E-mail netiquette. See below
> > for my response.
>
> Uh, sure. Most people don't get thanked for this, so I'm curious what
> prompted that.
Just giving positive feedback, to encourag
> Thanks for not top-posting and for following E-mail netiquette. See below for
> my response.
Uh, sure. Most people don't get thanked for this, so I'm curious what
prompted that.
> On Sunday 21 Feb 2010 05:01:12 Bryan R Harris wrote:
>>> On Saturday 20 Feb 2010 04:53:18 Bryan R Harris wrote:
> Bryan R Harris wrote:
>>
>>> Bryan R Harris wrote:
This is unintuitive:
perl -e 'print "> "; while(<>) {print(( eval $_ )[-1], "\n> ")}'
... then enter 2*012. It prints "20". 2*12 is obviously 24, but perl's
interpreting that "012" as octal. We sometimes hav
Hi Bryan!
Thanks for not top-posting and for following E-mail netiquette. See below for
my response.
On Sunday 21 Feb 2010 05:01:12 Bryan R Harris wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 Feb 2010 04:53:18 Bryan R Harris wrote:
> >> This is unintuitive:
> >> perl -e 'print "> "; while(<>) {print(( eval $_ )[
