On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 14:56, Chas. Owens wrote:
snip
> This seems close to what you want, but it needs work to make it take
> steps larger than 1:
snip
Here is another version that takes steps larger than one:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
# 12345678901
# *
# 5/11 chance of
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:22, wrote:
> Rob Dixon said :
>> r...@goto10.org wrote:
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > i am finding something couter intuative about randomness and search for a
>> > solution.
>> >
>> > i have a bit of code that randomly selects a number from an array and then
>> > adds
>> > it to
Rob Dixon said :
> r...@goto10.org wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > i am finding something couter intuative about randomness and search for a
> > solution.
> >
> > i have a bit of code that randomly selects a number from an array and then
> > adds
> > it to the previous number. I have two positive numb
r...@goto10.org wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am finding something couter intuative about randomness and search for a
> solution.
>
> i have a bit of code that randomly selects a number from an array and then
> adds
> it to the previous number. I have two positive numbers and their negitives
> qw(1 2
hi,
i am finding something couter intuative about randomness and search for a
solution.
i have a bit of code that randomly selects a number from an array and then adds
it to the previous number. I have two positive numbers and their negitives
qw(1 2 -1 -2)
i expected the below code to hover
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 07:13, Chas. Owens wrote:
snip
> Depends on your version of Perl. Perl prior to 5.8.1 the order of a
> set of keys in a hash was always the same (but unordered).
snip
This should read:
Perl prior to 5.8.1 the order of a set of keys in a hash was
always the same (
