"Gavin Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Saturday 02 Apr 2005 04:29, Johnstone, Colin wrote:
> > Gidday All,
> >
> > I would like to use xml Parser to parse this chunk of xml (below) and
> > return the business unit name and id attributes for each of the eleme
> "Brad" == Brad Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brad> Just to clarify, the only reason I don't need a new() method in the
Brad> subclass is because any class-specific logic is contained in the _init()
Brad> method for both parent and subclass. If there were no _init() method,
Brad> then
> "Jay" == Jay Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jay> I respectfully disagree. I blame Richard Stallman for my habits, not
Jay> Bill Gates, et. al. 'emacs test' when creating a file opens it in
Jay> Text Fill, but 'emacs test.pl' when creating a file saves me 'M-x
Jay> perl-mode' (or 'M-x Cp
> > And if I am, and specifying explicit imports for each module is beneficial
> > -
>
> Not for reason of speed. For reason of maintainability. You should only
> import names you are going to use, and then do so explicitly, so that a
> maintenance programmer doesn't look at the program wonder
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 09:23:53 -0500, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> This one is about my Tools.pm which uses Exporter and delivers a set of 5-
> 10 line subroutines for stupud tasks (number rounder, strip commas from
> numbers, commify them back, customized html entity decoder etc etc etc).
> What I am cu
On Saturday 02 Apr 2005 04:29, Johnstone, Colin wrote:
> Gidday All,
>
> I would like to use xml Parser to parse this chunk of xml (below) and
> return the business unit name and id attributes for each of the elements
> where division id = '221'
>
> I have tried
Why not try:
http://search.cpan.or
> Examine your concept of "reside in". You appear to be confused with
> modules that use the Exporter. You don't. I believe you'll find that
> you use SomeOther::Module *before* using Configuration in the main program,
> which means that the assignments haven't taken place yet.
>
A-ha! Some da
