Re: Goodbye bean-web, bean-bake, bean-report. What about bean-price?

2020-07-06 Thread Kirill Goncharov
I use bean-price / beancount.prices a lot (except the price sources) and interested in maintaining it. Though I'd rather maintain fork of the entire v2 codebase, because I don't see any reason to switch to v3. On Monday, July 6, 2020 at 6:04:31 AM UTC+3, Martin Blais wrote: > Hi, > A per > htt

Re: Beancount v3

2020-07-06 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 02:34:35AM -0400, Martin Blais wrote: > Today I'm starting development on Beancount v3. > > This is going to be a pretty big change and will take a while. > I've laid down the details in this document: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEf

Beancount v3 - Constraints & budgeting

2020-07-06 Thread Justus Pendleton
The v3 goals & design document expresses an openness to some kind of support for budgeting semantics. Beancount does not support budgeting constraints explicitly, but I think it > would be possible to extend the balance assertion semantics to cover this. > > The current balance assertions check

Re: Beancount v3

2020-07-06 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 03:09:34AM -0700, Andre Engelbrecht wrote: > *Disclosure*: I've converted a couple of people from using webapps or > spreadsheets to use ledger. They love ledger despite some of the > nuance. I've been trying to move them over to beancount, but having a > bit harder time bec

Re: Beancount v3

2020-07-06 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 11:48:00PM -0700, Justus Pendleton wrote: > * Have a "bugmaster". This is a community member who isn't even necessarily > that acquainted with the code base (perhaps not even technical at all) but > they are engaged with the project and can help reply to new bug reports >

Re: Goodbye bean-web, bean-bake, bean-report. What about bean-price?

2020-07-06 Thread Daniel Clemente
> Checkout branch "v2" if you really must have those right now. > Let me know if you care for those, at this stage I could easily fork a copy to a separate repository (for others to maintain). I still use bean-web from time to time, though I don't depend on it since I have my own scripts to extrac

Re: Healthcare Structuring Question

2020-07-06 Thread Tono Riesco
Well… What I’m doing is: 2020-03-06 * “Dentist A" “Dentist urgency bla..bla." Assets:Account:Bank -100 CHF Expenses:Me:Dentist 2020-03-06 * “Pharmacy A" “Dentist urgency meds" Assets:Cash -10 CHF Expenses:Me:Meds

Re: Goodbye bean-web, bean-bake, bean-report. What about bean-price?

2020-07-06 Thread Kirill Goncharov
I'm also thinking about staying on v2. It covers all my needs, I love that it is written in python and it seems that v3 will bring too many breaking changes. I don't use the parts which were removed, but I think it is important to provide at least some support for their users. The idea of split

Re: Beancount v3

2020-07-06 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello Justus, open source projects evolve and function in very different ways from more structured enterprises. They are often described as do-ocracies: the control is in the hands of those that step up to do things that go in what is perceived to be the direction of the project as a whole. There

Re: Beancount v3

2020-07-06 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 06/07/2020 03:00, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > You mention you're gonna keep using flex/bison, which is for sure well > known technology. However, the expressivity of bison grammars make it > kinda hard to hack on existing parsers, raising the barrier for > contributors. Have you considered switc

Re: Goodbye bean-web, bean-bake, bean-report. What about bean-price?

2020-07-06 Thread Martin Blais
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 11:17 PM Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > On 05/07/2020 21:04, Martin Blais wrote: > > Hi, > > A > > per > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEfhWhrVBsfc/ > > I just deleted: > > - bean-web (use Fava) > > - bean-bake (unfortunately no replacement)

Re: Goodbye bean-web, bean-bake, bean-report. What about bean-price?

2020-07-06 Thread Martin Blais
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 3:15 AM Kirill Goncharov wrote: > I use bean-price / beancount.prices a lot (except the price sources) and > interested in maintaining it. Though I'd rather maintain fork of the entire > v2 codebase, because I don't see any reason to switch to v3. > v3 will take a while, b

Re: Goodbye bean-web, bean-bake, bean-report. What about bean-price?

2020-07-06 Thread Martin Blais
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 2:04 PM Kirill Goncharov wrote: > I'm also thinking about staying on v2. It covers all my needs, I love that > it is written in python and it seems that v3 will bring too many breaking > changes. > Actually I don't expect that v3 will break much. Existing syntax and semant

Re: Beancount v3

2020-07-06 Thread Martin Blais
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 3:27 AM Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martin Blais [2020-07-04 02:34]: > > This is going to be a pretty big change and will take a while. > > I've laid down the details in this document: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEfhWhrVBsfc/ >

Re: Beancount v3

2020-07-06 Thread Martin Blais
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 4:20 AM Kirill Goncharov wrote: > Hi, > > What is the scope of expected breaking changes and how difficult will it > be to migrate? I use beancount a lot and particularly interested in API > changes in core, prices, ingest, loader and query subpackages. > Syntax and semant