Re: Holdings query output in fava

2020-03-09 Thread Red S
Found the answer for (2) as well: query.run_query(numberify=True) On Saturday, March 7, 2020 at 2:48:11 AM UTC-8, Red S wrote: > > When I go to the Holdings page in fava and click "Query", it drops me into > the query page with what's presumably the query run for the Holdings page. > > 1) Howeve

Re: New tool: Tax loss harvester for beancount

2020-03-09 Thread Justus Pendleton
On Sunday, March 8, 2020 at 7:54:03 AM UTC+7, Red S wrote: > > I cleaned up a tool I've been using to find opportunities to do tax loss > harvesting from my beancount file, and am sharing it here > . > Nice work! I have a similar script

Re: New tool: Tax loss harvester for beancount

2020-03-09 Thread Red S
Great feedback, thanks! Fixes for all your points coming very soon. Meanwhile, I'm working on a fava plugin version. I'm considering continuing further development only on the fava version, given it's additional effort to maintain both. Curious: do you use fava, and would you prefer having this

New Fava extension: Tax loss harvester

2020-03-09 Thread Red S
I recently shared a beancount tool for identifying tax loss harvesting opportunities. This is the fava plugin version. Starting a new thread for this because these these are different code bases, and I intend primarily to develop t

Re: New tool: Tax loss harvester for beancount

2020-03-09 Thread Red S
I just shared my fava extension that takes care of most of these. Let me know if you use fava. Detail: > * It requires argcomplete & tabulate; you might want to mention that in the github README. Will add. > * You only show the leaf part of the account name. That's understandable but in my h

Re: New tool: Tax loss harvester for beancount

2020-03-09 Thread Justus Pendleton
On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 8:30:06 AM UTC+7, Red S wrote: > Meanwhile, I'm working on a fava plugin version. I'm considering > continuing further development only on the fava version, given it's > additional effort to maintain both. Curious: do you use fava, and would you > prefer having thi