beancount-web produces the same outputs of positive and negatives, so it's
not fava's fault?
Perhaps I need education as to how things to think of things on balance
sheets and income statements.
ie on reports:
assets +'ve & equity -'ve === income -'ve & expenses +'ve?
vs
assets- & equity+ ==
* John Mee <*@johnmee.com> [2019-05-09 00:26]:
> beancount-web produces the same outputs of positive and negatives,
> so it's not fava's fault?
You may want to read this introduction to find out why income, equity
and liabilities are negative in beancount:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/100tG
Am 09.05.19 um 08:44 schrieb John Mee:> Perhaps this is an issue of fava,
I'm sure you'll redirect me if so... my problem is that fava's balance
sheet shows assets as positive values and equity as negative (which is also
odd, imho both sides should be positive values?) thence the income
Stateme
I understand you.
The problem here is that Beancount does not use traditional double-entry terms
like "credit" and "debit" for different types of accounts. It uses signs. It
uses this modified account equation:
(Income + Liabilities) + (Assets + Expenses) + Equity = 0
So, in most cases, Income
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:51:15AM -0400, Zhuoyun Wei wrote:
> Perhaps Fava could provide a fava-option that flips the signs to
> generate a "traditional" Income Statement and Balance Sheet?
There are indeed two different aspects here that have been conflated in
this thread.
One is what Beancount
https://github.com/beancount/fava/issues/920
--
Zhuoyun Wei
On Thu, May 9, 2019, at 05:18, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:51:15AM -0400, Zhuoyun Wei wrote:
> > Perhaps Fava could provide a fava-option that flips the signs to
> > generate a "traditional" Income Statement a
Showing the sign on the traditional way meaning positive for income and
negative for expenses could also have some consequences.
For example: I see the transactions related to my banking account.
Here when I have a transaction where it is a expense, it is logical that
the legs of the transaction r
Our mac is a geriatric!
Prof R Gott
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 at 5:17 PM
> From: "Zhuoyun Wei"
> To: Beancount
> Subject: Re: bean-bake export from linux to mac or windows
>
> I heard that recent versions of macOS use a newer filesystem named APFS.
> Perhaps you could try to open the fi
The man's a star. I shall try that asap.
Thank you
Richard
Prof R Gott
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 at 4:31 AM
> From: "Martin Blais"
> To: Beancount
> Subject: Re: bean-bake export from linux to mac or windows
>
> bergamot:~$ bean-bake --help
> ...
> --no-colons Don't render col
I went to the dentist last month for a root canal and had to pay out of
pocket for the costs and I was reimbursed later on, but not the full amount
of the cost. I have an account, Expenses:Medical:Dental, which I usually
charge against. The idea behind this account is that at the end of the yea
Hello,
I extended my importer to also work as transformer, applying the rules used
at input on existing beancount files:
entries, error, option_map = bc.loader.load_file(args.inputfile)
transformed_entries = []
for e in entries:
transformed_entries.append(transform_txn(e) if
In your example, from the 1500 CAD only 500 CAD are from your money, so
that's the only expense (and I guess it's the only part you can deduct when
filing taxes). The other 1000 CAD are like a loan you're making to your
insurance (you're lending them money to pay the bill and you later recover
it).
Thank you Daniel. That is what I was looking for!
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 11:38:56 AM UTC-4, Daniel Clemente wrote:
>
> In your example, from the 1500 CAD only 500 CAD are from your money, so
> that's the only expense (and I guess it's the only part you can deduct when
> filing taxes). The o
> You may want to read this introduction to find out why income, equity
> and liabilities are negative in beancount:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/100tGcA4blh6KSXPRGCZpUlyxaRUwFHEvnz_k9DyZFn4/edit
>
>
Thanks Martin. It's reassuring to discover that this 'fault' is by
design. What
...doh, sorry for the noise, that should probably be around the other
way... fiddle until it is right. I just wanted to suggest tagging as the
solution.
2019-04-16 * "Insurance" "Medical Expense reimbursement for Root Canal"
#reimbursment #
Assets:Chequing 1000.00 CAD
Exp
I'd shy away from editing the old transaction as it discards the timeline
and doesn't reflect reality. You have transactions on your CC that your
accounts don't correctly reflect! In this instance it was only a few days,
but sometimes these things take weeks, or months, for the cycle to be
co
I read your message twice. I don't understand what you're trying to do.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:12 AM Florian Lindner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I extended my importer to also work as transformer, applying the rules
> used at input on existing beancount files:
>
> entries, error, option_map = b
Two old ideas which have never been implemented:
- Allow all positive signs in the input, inverting based on the accounts
(all postings are associated with accounts, so this would be easy).
This may make it a little more difficult to eyeball that a transaction
balances properly, but that's up to t
There's a lot to say and it's an involved topic (especially with in-network
and out-of-network differences), I can't do it right now (I'll write a doc
at some point, I started writing something here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16RKEl1NJ3qg8VU9vKRRvgIv3CyGs0_4ASS4lD5iBFTw/edit?usp=sharing
bu
19 matches
Mail list logo
