In a post from last year[1] there is an example of how to record an in-kind
transfer which seems straightforward enough.
2016-02-01 * "In-kind Transfer"
Assets:BrokerageA:NYSE -100 NYSE {10.00 USD}
Assets:BrokerageA:NYSE -100 NYSE {11.00 USD}
Assets:BrokerageB:NYSE 100
> However, if you have lots of lots having to list them all (twice!) is a bit
> painful. Is there a shorter syntax that I haven't found?
>
> The scenario is: imagine after doing years of monthly purchases you switch to
> a new brokerage. You might have 100+ lots. Ideally you
> just want to type
bean-doctor can give you the same sort of context as what you're seeing in
the web interface. Both the vim and emacs plugins support looking up a
transaction's context (I know the vim plugin is c). From there you
can just copy and paste the lines.
When getting the context in this way, the lots a
On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 11:20:34 PM UTC+7, Daniel Clemente wrote:
>
> When I need to move all lots, I write the transaction without the lots (so
> it doesn't balance)
>
How do you write this? I tried a few variants but I must be dim this
morningbecause I couldn't make it not balance li
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Jason Chu wrote:
> bean-doctor can give you the same sort of context as what you're seeing in
> the web interface. Both the vim and emacs plugins support looking up a
> transaction's context (I know the vim plugin is c). From there you
> can just copy and paste
Hi,
I'm trying to understand best-practices for entries, and if there are
pros/cons to grouping transections in one entry, or splitting it up.
The following is based on going to IKEA, eating lunch, buying a piece of
furniture with a US CC, and getting it delivered.
2017-08-25 * "IKEA"
Assets
