BTW you're totally welcome to have those discussions here.
(Personally I find it discussions more difficult to read from tickets on
Github; I tend to ignore those by default, unless you call out for my
attention specifically. Maybe it's just habit though.)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Domi
@Martin, if you "Watch" the GitHub project, you get all discussions through
email, and can reply that way too. I rarely use the actual GitHub web
interface.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 12:56 Martin Blais wrote:
> BTW you're totally welcome to have those discussions here.
>
> (Personally I find it disc
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 03:35:07PM -0500, Martin Blais wrote:
> > > If you don't want to impose your views on others, GPL2+ is really the
> > > only right choice here.
> >
> > That wouldn't work: If someone decides to make a copy as GPL
Thanks Daniel. Done. I will follow that way.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Daniël Bos wrote:
> @Martin, if you "Watch" the GitHub project, you get all discussions
> through email, and can reply that way too. I rarely use the actual GitHub
> web interface.
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 12:56 Mar
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:10:22AM -0500, Martin Blais wrote:
> I think at the EOTD we just disagree on the license issue and let's
> just leave it at that.
Except I didn't start this thread trying to agree on a license. Or on
anything else, really. I started this thread just to point out that it
