Re: Is Python >=3.5 okay?

2016-10-30 Thread Martin Blais
Stefan, Can you quickly test out if your 3.4 installation allows a pip install of "typing"? Thanks, On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > I just realized Python 3.5.1 was released almost a year ago (12/7/2015). > > According to https://www.debian.org/releases/ > > The

2.0b13

2016-10-30 Thread Martin Blais
I just cut a new release, 2.0b13. I'm planning to make some big changes with user impact soon; this is the last release before these changes. The future changes will involve: - Make the new booking algorithm the default - Deprecate all legacy support (old things will go away) - Begin including sup

Re: Is Python >=3.5 okay?

2016-10-30 Thread Martin Blais
I just made a fresh install of Python 3.4, installed pip, and tested that a simple "pip3 install typing" works, and the symbols I'm going to introduce are present in it and import without error. On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Martin Blais wrote: > Stefan, > Can you quickly test out if your

Re: Is Python >=3.5 okay?

2016-10-30 Thread Martin Blais
Alright, I've been staring at this too long. I understand Debian is lagging behind a lot, but the source release is really old, and Ubuntu stable (16.04) is on 3.5.1. I really want the work with datatypes to kick off sooner than later, and I'm doing a big cleanup branch, along with some other clea

Beancount Updates - 2016-10-30

2016-10-30 Thread Martin Blais
It has been a good 6 months since the last update. Lots of important changes recently - in particular, moving to the newer and better booking algorithm, requiring Python 3.5 and I've deprecated a bunch of old deprecated stuff. It's possible you will experience user-visible changes. Full details bel