ing automatically this way,
>> too many unknown numbers to fill in.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:08 AM david e wrote:
>>
>>> wouldn't it be correct to add the transaction costs in its own account
>>> into the transaction, and thereby bean
3:47 UTC+2:
> Beancount won't be able to work out the booking automatically this way,
> too many unknown numbers to fill in.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:08 AM david e wrote:
>
>> wouldn't it be correct to add the transaction costs in its own account
>> into the
Beancount won't be able to work out the booking automatically this way, too
many unknown numbers to fill in.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:08 AM david e wrote:
> wouldn't it be correct to add the transaction costs in its own account
> into the transaction, and thereby beancount
wouldn't it be correct to add the transaction costs in its own account into
the transaction, and thereby beancount is able to list the fees separately?
compared to my example from above I would have to add one line:
2018-01-01 * "Send 1.5 ETH & 0.05 ETH gas"
Assets:Cryp
There's no facility to do this.
You can write a script to handle the separation by processing the stream of
transactions yourself.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:16 PM david e wrote:
> I am wondering about how to book transaction costs correctly. as I am
> doing ethereum tx, I have to
I am wondering about how to book transaction costs correctly. as I am doing
ethereum tx, I have to track cost basis of the fees. compared to paying
fees to a broker, this is a bit more work.
my entry would look like this:
2018-01-01 * "Send 1.5 ETH & 0.05 ETH gas"
Assets:Cr
