On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:07:09PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Is this SMOP (and if so I'll be happy to file a ticket), or am I missing
> something more profound here?
^--- "this" being "supporting tags on individual postings"
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . z...@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/z
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 09:40:06PM -0400, Martin Blais wrote:
> > is there a profound reason (which I'm clearly missing) why #tags can be
> > attached to a transaction as a whole, but not to individual postings?
>
> No profound reason, just history.
*nod*
> You're welcome to file a ticket, but I
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> is there a profound reason (which I'm clearly missing) why #tags can be
> attached to a transaction as a whole, but not to individual postings?
>
No profound reason, just history.
It seems to me that, conceptually, if me
Dear all,
is there a profound reason (which I'm clearly missing) why #tags can be
attached to a transaction as a whole, but not to individual postings?
It seems to me that, conceptually, if metadata are allowed to be both
transaction-global and posting-specific, so should #tags.
There are two wo
