Re: [beagleboard] Programming without programming discussion

we know your Too old so don't deny it. :P On 5/7/2016 10:00 PM, William Hermans wrote: > toold == tools > > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:59 PM, William Hermans > wrote: > > /Someday, someone will probably come up with visual system > that's general, open sour

Re: [beagleboard] Programming without programming discussion

toold == tools On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:59 PM, William Hermans wrote: > *Someday, someone will probably come up with visual system that's general, >> open source and amenable to maintaining in git---but that day hasn't >> arrived yet.* >> > > I think that right now, probably the toold that are c

Re: [beagleboard] Programming without programming discussion

> > *Someday, someone will probably come up with visual system that's general, > open source and amenable to maintaining in git---but that day hasn't > arrived yet.* > I think that right now, probably the toold that are closest are the better UML apps out there. Rational Rose, and Microsoft Visio.

Re: [beagleboard] Programming without programming discussion

> > These graphical or visual programming languages you denigrate really do >> help scientists, engineers, and other "domain experts" who aren't, and >> don't want to become, "programmers" implement an idea for which there is >> not, and will never be until the idea is proven sound, a budget for "h

Re: [beagleboard] Programming without programming discussion

Wally, Also, in addition to the above. Your friend for example, and the Nodejs / node red discussion you've been having lately. If you friend is an Engineer, then learning the quick basic of javascript would take far less time than you've been discussing the problems you've been having on this goo

[beagleboard] Programming without programming discussion

So wally I didn't want to step all over Jason's post by discussing this further, there. Also keep in mind that this is just a discussion. There is not right or wrong, only right or wrong for individuals. Or personal beliefs if you will. I won't disagree with what you say, but it ignores a few s