[BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread OOMMEN KM
Hi All, I would like to know which technology should I use for developing a web based application. The application will have to handle a huge amount of data and we are using MySQL. Will mod_python a good option for the development of this application? Or I need to choose some frame works? Please

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Ataulla S H
go for pylons framework with mysql On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:47 PM, OOMMEN KM wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to know which technology should I use for developing a web > based application. > The application will have to handle a huge amount of data and we are using > MySQL. > Will mod_python a

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 15:47 +0530, OOMMEN KM wrote: > Will mod_python a good option for the development of this application? > Or I > need to choose some frame works? mod_python is dead - try django -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves http://lawgon.livejournal.com/

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Balachandran Sivakumar
Hi, On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > > mod_python is dead - try django Django may be a good option. But mod_python is not dead. The verbatim message from mod_python website: Currently mod_python is not under active development. This does not mean that it is "d

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Baiju M
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: >> >> mod_python is dead - try django > >         Django may be a good option. But mod_python is not dead. The > verbatim message from mod_python website: > > Currently

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Balachandran Sivakumar
Hi On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Baiju M wrote: > > mod_python has been officially declared as dead. It has been declared dead by a few. The mod_python site says it isn't. > And the code base is unmaintained for a long time (many years). Yes, for about 2 years. > http:

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Sudheer Satyanarayana
On Thursday 05 May 2011 03:52 PM, Ataulla S H wrote: go for pylons framework with mysql To be precise, use Pyramid. Pylons is now a brand name under which several projects exist. Pylons 1.0 is now a legacy framework. If you are looking at Pylons, go with Pyramid. A typical Pyramid application u

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 16:25 +0530, Balachandran Sivakumar wrote: > Currently mod_python is not under active development. This does not > mean that it is "dead" as some people have claimed. It smiply means > that the code and the project are mature enough when very little is > required to maintain i

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
OOMMEN KM writes: > Hi All, > > I would like to know which technology should I use for developing a > web based application. The application will have to handle a huge > amount of data and we are using MySQL. Will mod_python a good option > for the development of this application? Or I need to

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:10:39PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > no doubt dead men do not tell lies - but the fact is that Apache has > long ago dropped support for it. And no one in their right mind would > use it. Looks like I fall into that category. :) I was using mod_python effectively i

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 20:30 +0800, Senthil Kumaran wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:10:39PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > > no doubt dead men do not tell lies - but the fact is that Apache has > > long ago dropped support for it. And no one in their right mind > would > > use it. > > Looks

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Baiju M
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Baiju M wrote: >> >> mod_python has been officially declared as dead. > >           It has been declared dead by a  few. The mod_python site > says it isn't. It's not written by some "few", rat

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:06:40PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > I do not think you would use it today - with a modern apache. I should have been more specific. It was 2010 when we were using mod_python and still (in 2011) my colleagues who should be maintaining the project would be using mod_

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
Senthil Kumaran writes: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:06:40PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: >> I do not think you would use it today - with a modern apache. > > I should have been more specific. It was 2010 when we were using > mod_python and still (in 2011) my colleagues who should be maintaini

Re: [BangPypers] Web Application Development

2011-05-05 Thread Gopalakrishnan Subramani
You need to be careful enough to choose between Django vs Pylons/Pyramid Django has larger community than Pyramid has now and you are likely to find many examples, tutorials, reusable apps and hacks in Django than Pyramid. Until or unless you know that Django's default ORM or its template are not