Btw, the following wiki page lists the upstream patches from
Unladen-swallow.
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/UpstreamPatches
--
--Anand
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpype
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [..]
>
> What I am more worried is that if Google produces a CPython
> implementation on *nix which is say 50-100 times faster than
> the main CPython implementation for most common operations,
> then wit
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
> > Details here
> >
> http://jessenoller.com/2010/01/06/unladen-swallow-python-3s-best-feature/
> >
> >
> Interesting to read about that merge back
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
> abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim
> wrote:
> >
> > > Details here
> > >
> >
> http://jessenoller.com/2010/01/06/unladen-swallow-p
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:30:05PM +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> > >
> > Interesting to read about that merge back to py3k. Never read
> > any related posts in pydev yet. I wonder if Guido is ok with this.
>
> The same sentime
>>>Can you elaborate a little about the "free" part?
>>>Do you expect the Google to treat Python like Sun treated Java in the
early days?
+1 for this question.
I am very much eager to hear from AB.
Regards,
Srini T
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
___
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:30:05PM +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> >
> Interesting to read about that merge back to py3k. Never read
> any related posts in pydev yet. I wonder if Guido is ok with this.
The same sentiment here. Except for this post from Jesse Noller (which
seems more of
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
> > Details here
> >
> http://jessenoller.com/2010/01/06/unladen-swallow-python-3s-best-feature/
> >
> >
> Interesting to read about that merge back
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Details here
> http://jessenoller.com/2010/01/06/unladen-swallow-python-3s-best-feature/
>
>
Interesting to read about that merge back to py3k. Never read
any related posts in pydev yet. I wonder if Guido is ok with this.
Looks like Pyt
This is news to me. Wish I had enough time to dabble in these initiatives.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Details here
> http://jessenoller.com/2010/01/06/unladen-swallow-python-3s-best-feature/
>
> --
> ~noufal
> http://nibrahim.net.in
> ___
Details here
http://jessenoller.com/2010/01/06/unladen-swallow-python-3s-best-feature/
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
2009/4/2 Baishampayan Ghose :
>> Bingo! It seems like cPickle is fast until you play with something like a
>> recent version of simplejson...now that's fast. And then it's like, boy is
>> cPickle slow. Pretty soon you're jsonifying everything. :)
>
> And simplejson is fast until you play with c
> Bingo! It seems like cPickle is fast until you play with something like a
> recent version of simplejson...now that's fast. And then it's like, boy is
> cPickle slow. Pretty soon you're jsonifying everything. :)
And simplejson is fast until you play with cjson. Now _that_ is fast :)
Regards
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Shekhar wrote:
> > Already slashdotted and many of us should already be knowing but could
> > not resist posting.
> >
> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/googl
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think they should also take a look at the work already done in
> Parrot and Cython which can be reused.
>
Parrot is kinda dead (gone to meet the maker? :P)
Also, pypy's design considerations can be us
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Shekhar wrote:
> Already slashdotted and many of us should already be knowing but could
> not resist posting.
> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
> http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/
Already slashdotted and many of us should already be knowing but could
not resist posting.
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
Apart from performance boost there is al
17 matches
Mail list logo