Vishal writes:
[...]
> I think the main point of doing a Python-to-C conversion followed by
> creation of a dll which is re-imported into Python is performance.
> Obfuscation is a by-product of this process. But if code-protection is more
> paramount...it can be the considered the other way rou
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Sriram Karra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Vishal wrote:
>
> > >
> > > a) "test.py" a very simple 1KB python file with a main function
> > > b) "_c_test.c" a 35KB file that is generated by 2c-py
> > >
> > > (b) gets generated by the following cmd line:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Vishal wrote:
> >
> > a) "test.py" a very simple 1KB python file with a main function
> > b) "_c_test.c" a 35KB file that is generated by 2c-py
> >
> > (b) gets generated by the following cmd line:
> >
> > > 2c-py -c test.py
> >
> > As you can see the 'c' file gene
Sending again. Since the files did not go through... :(
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Vishal wrote:
>
>> Hello Sriram,
>
> I think there is some confusion as to what the general-case Python to C
> compiler's create. So I made a test case and have attached the input and
> output files. hopeful
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Vishal wrote:
> 2c-python seems to convert python to its own C equivalent which is then
> compiled and can be loaded dynamically into the interpreter. Cython / Swig
> etc can do this already.
What interpreter are you referring to?
>From your original email: "I
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Sriram Karra wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Vishal wrote:
>
>
> > I am looking for something more "simple", i.e. instead of writing C and
> > compiling it to machine instructions...write python (restricted set..may
> > be) and convert it to machine ins
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Vishal wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
>> abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Vishal wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > Do
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Vishal wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
> abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Vishal wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Does anybody know of any effort that can covert a relatively static
> > ve
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Vishal wrote:
> I am looking for something more "simple", i.e. instead of writing C and
> compiling it to machine instructions...write python (restricted set..may
> be) and convert it to machine instructions.
>
Have no personal experience with this sort of thin
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Vishal wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anybody know of any effort that can covert a relatively static
> version
> > of python code into assembly for use with microcontrolle
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Vishal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know of any effort that can covert a relatively static version
> of python code into assembly for use with microcontrollers ?
>
Just wondering what is the need for this ? If you are coding in Python
in the first place do y
Hello,
Does anybody know of any effort that can covert a relatively static version
of python code into assembly for use with microcontrollers ?
CorePy did it but not for microcontrollers
P14p (or PyMite) actually creates a python interpreter in C and puts it
inside the microcontroller, and its GP
12 matches
Mail list logo
