[BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-24 Thread Pratham Gadre
Hello Brian & Jesse, I am an incognito member of the BangPypers mailing list. Reason for being incognito is simple, the people who run the list are very sensitive to criticism and react in a harsh and non-professional manner. I was looking to see, who I could raise this issue to, via the Python.or

Re: [BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-22 Thread Palak Mathur
On May 22, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Noufal Ibrahim KV wrote: Let's just let this pass? I, for one, don't have the time or interest to handle these kinds of things. If any of the people want to discuss this on the list, please do but I don't really want to spend any of my time on it. -- Cordially, N

Re: [BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-22 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
Let's just let this pass? I, for one, don't have the time or interest to handle these kinds of things. If any of the people want to discuss this on the list, please do but I don't really want to spend any of my time on it. -- Cordially, Noufal http://nibrahim.net.in

Re: [BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-22 Thread L. Guruprasad
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Vijay Ramachandran wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:30 PM, wrote: > >> Just for context, here's the email where Danny says that he was not >> offended by the first email and didn't interpret it in the way that >> Pratham did >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/

Re: [BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-22 Thread Vijay Ramachandran
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:30 PM, wrote: > Just for context, here's the email where Danny says that he was not > offended by the first email and didn't interpret it in the way that > Pratham did > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2014-May/010161.html > > and my follow up reply saying t

Re: [BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-22 Thread Jeffrey Jose
Ha, I stand corrected. Senthil's reponse did contain everything the original poster wanted. Now I'm not sure what everyone's upset about. On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Jeffrey Jose wrote: > ​At the risk of giving a non-issue more visibility, we’re being extremely > silly here. I went through

Re: [BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-22 Thread Jeffrey Jose
​At the risk of giving a non-issue more visibility, we’re being extremely silly here. I went through the emails here and I dont find anything offensive or sarcastic or twisted in any of the replies. I do however find 2 things odd though. - Senthil’s original reply of *I looked and found it* was

Re: [BangPypers] Raising issue WRT Bangpypers mailing list

2014-05-22 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
Just for context, here's the email where Danny says that he was not offended by the first email and didn't interpret it in the way that Pratham did https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2014-May/010161.html and my follow up reply saying that I didn't mean it that way either. https://mail.p