On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Vishal wrote:
> Well, what I meant was: Everyone knows its an interpreted language and we
> are choosing it for its productivity. Also, since its interpreted, its
> performance will not / most probably not match that with compiled
> languages...so any news in incre
Well, what I meant was: Everyone knows its an interpreted language and we
are choosing it for its productivity. Also, since its interpreted, its
performance will not / most probably not match that with compiled
languages...so any news in increase in performance is a giantly welcome
thing. Sometimes
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 Oct 2009 2:55:16 pm Vishal wrote:
>> Are there anymore details that can be shared? Interested to know...because
>> performance is always one of most sought after metric when choosing an
>> interpreted language.
>
> I thought
On Tuesday 13 Oct 2009 2:55:16 pm Vishal wrote:
> Are there anymore details that can be shared? Interested to know...because
> performance is always one of most sought after metric when choosing an
> interpreted language.
I thought it was the least important?
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejourn
Hi,
In our recent meet, there was a talk about python performance improvements
when compiled using gcc 4.4.
Are there anymore details that can be shared? Interested to know...because
performance is always one of most sought after metric when choosing an
interpreted language.
Thanks and best regar
