Hi
Python 3.0 provides the best solution to my problem with annotations.But
for the time being I am able to work with the way Sidharth proposed using
decorators.
:)
Thanx guys
Heshan Suriyaarachchi
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
htt
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Kushal Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 03 April 2008 06:53:18 pm Shameer Khadar wrote:
> > Hi Kushal,
> >
> > This is nice,
> > But it is always painful to read a whole book through html links :)
> > Can you please put a pdf copy of the current vers
On Thursday 03 April 2008 06:53:18 pm Shameer Khadar wrote:
> Hi Kushal,
>
> This is nice,
> But it is always painful to read a whole book through html links :)
> Can you please put a pdf copy of the current version of your book.
The toolchain I am using for writing this book is currently little bi
Hi Kushal,
This is nice,
But it is always painful to read a whole book through html links :)
Can you please put a pdf copy of the current version of your book.
Cheers,
Shameer
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Kushal Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am writing a book on Python for newbies
Hi,
You can simulate annotation using decorators. I might be missing
something about annotation but you can do this.
def annotate(returns, **params):
def decorate(func):
params['returns'] = returns
func.__annotations__ = params
return func
return decorate
@
Hi,
I am writing a book on Python for newbies. You can see it here
http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/book/
I am looking for feedback. Flowers and stones both are welcome
Kushal
--
Fedora Ambassador, India
http://kushaldas.in
http://dgplug.org (Linux User Group of Durgapur)
_
No, I don't think so. Python has the trick of "peeking into the future" by
backporting a feature in a future version to the current version by using
the __future__ module.
However I run Python 2.5 and I do not see any mention of function
annotations in __future__ module.
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863,
>
> Hi Anand,
This is what I exactly mean. This is the thing I want to do. I am now
using python 2.5.1 . So is
there a way that I can do a thing like this in python 2.5.1 ( an
alternative way).
Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>
>
> >>> def f(x : "an integer", y: "another integer") -> "Sum of x and
I had started a couple of blog posts aiming at discussing the new
features, changes and gotchas in Python 3.0. I had made the first
couple of posts 2 weeks back. The plan is to try and post as much
as possible before Py3k releases in Aug this year.
This question has reminded me to restart the post
Functions in Python are first-class objects, so you can add
arbitrary attributes to them like any other object.
Like Siddharth said, you can do,
def f(x, y): return x + y
f.x = 100
>>>f(20, 30)
50
However as of 2.x Python does not provide any syntax for formal function
annotations like Java. Th
H Heshan,
Can you explain why you'd want to do this?
You can write
def f():
print f.a
f.a = 4
f()
But I can't see you would want to do something like that. Maybe if you
give a use case. Someone can come up with a solution.
Regards,
Sidharth
On Apr 3, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Heshan Suriya
Hi
What I meant was a situation like this.
In javascript I'm used to associating metadata with a function as
follows.
foo.bar = "foobar";
function foo(){
}
What is the normal python practice to do this kind of a thing.
Your help is very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Heshan Suriyaarachchi
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
