Peter L. Buschman wrote:
> All:
>
> If it isn't too much of an imposition, I'd like to survey the list
> and ask the question
> "what operating system are you running Bacula on?". I'm interested in which OS
> distributions, versions and platforms are being deployed as Bacula servers.
>
> Mainly,
Hi all,
We are moving to Bacula from Amanda and so far it looks very good, nice
piece of work!
One thing I miss is the ability to create a printed report automatically
after a backup job is completed, a summary of what's been done.
With Amanda, we created a pdf file containing the hosts, size and
[crossposting out of impatience, sorry for that]
Hi,
I just upgraded our bacula-server from 1.3.8 to version 2.2.0 using
portupgrade.
Now bacula-dir fails to start:
Could not open pid file. /var/run/bacula-dir.9101.pid ERR=Permission denied
I assume it tries to start as the "bacula" user, but
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2007 at 18:10, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> See http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=923
>
gives me a login page...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grep
So,
What did I do wrong here?
I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6.
Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with
16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume "UNW259L2" previously written, moving
to end of data.
16-Aug 21:47 candyman-sd: mars.2007-08-16_21.30.02 Error: Bacula
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> So,
>
> What did I do wrong here?
>
> I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6.
> Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with
>
> 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume "UNW259L2" previously written, moving
Martin Simmons wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:27:17 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark said:
>> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>>> So,
>>>
>>> What did I do wrong here?
>>>
>>> I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6.
>>&
Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail:
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST)
For the recipient the above message appears to have been receieved at
03:48, two hours ahead.
The correct timezone is UTC +2, the above header should have read
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2
Martin Simmons wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:27:17 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark said:
>>> and eventually all available tapes went Append -> Error
>>>
>>> There were no errors in previous 2.0.3 backups and I did not see any
>>> notes t
Dan Langille wrote:
> Folks:
>
> sysutils/bacula-server-devel has been updated to 2.5.42.b2 (which is
> pretty close to 3.0).
>
> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/bacula-server-devel/
>
> I'd appreciate some feedback on this upgrade. It's pretty close to 3.x,
> which is what I'll be working
Dan Langille wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>> Folks:
>>>
>>> sysutils/bacula-server-devel has been updated to 2.5.42.b2 (which is
>>> pretty close to 3.0).
>>>
>>> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/ba
Hi,
After moving from 2.4 to 3.0, our Nagios system complains "Unknown
response" or somesuch.
At appears that the response from FD has changed between bacula versions
here, is that intentional?
Was: 2000 OK Hello
Is: 2000 OK Hello 1
Could someone shed a little light here?
Thanks,
--
per
--
Hello,
As stated in the subject, how can one get two (identical) changers work
together seamlessly in the same pool so when one has its tapes filled up
the next will continue without intervention?
Thanks,
//per
--
C
enough for me.
And, changers are mechanical devices that sometimes break, having two
means you can loose one and still do your job.
Cheers,
//per
On 07/03/2017 12:05 PM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hello,
As stated in the subject, how can one get two (identical) changers
work together
On 2017-07-05 09:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Please carefully consider the advice from Josh Fisher. It is very good
> advice.
>
> Kern
Yes, agree.
> On 07/04/2017 12:46 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> On 2017-07-03 17:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> Hello,
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
