Hi -
I've been playing around with Bacula lately, and am quite simply amazed.
Kern, I've really got to hand it to you and your team - you have all
put together an amazing piece of software. Thank you for many, many
years to come, as I dig even deeper into Bacula.
I've become a real stickler
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 December 2006 11:02, James Harper wrote:
>> Assuming that the user would be responsible for the initial partitioning
>> etc, is there any reason that a generic 'bare metal' restore CD could
>> not be made? It looks like the catalogs and bootstrap files can be
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> for an individual file include you can place an "@" in front of the
> filename.
> I dont think that there is a full directory include at this time.
>
> Here is an example of my bacula-dir.conf:
>
> Director {
> Name = kninfra01_mycastle-dir
> DIRport = 9501
> Que
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 December 2006 20:23, Dan Trainor wrote:
>> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 26 December 2006 11:02, James Harper wrote:
>>>> Assuming that the user would be responsible for the initial partitioning
>>>> etc, is t
Hi, all -
Now, Kern, I noticed that you're noted as the RPM package maintainer for
the 1.38 series - should the same be assumed about the 2.0 series, as
well?
I guess what I'm getting at is, I'm sure there are a few people who are
plenty eager to find a nice SRPM for the 2.0 series, because we
; On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 20:23 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 January 2007 19:53, Dan Trainor wrote:
>>> Hi, all -
>>>
>>> Now, Kern, I noticed that you're noted as the RPM package maintainer for
>>> the 1.38 series - should the same be
Good morning -
I've not yet started using Bacula, but I'm getting ready to. I'm very
impressed with how it works, and the documentation is clear and concise
- even without having used bacula yet, I'm very impressed.
One thing that I did not see in the documentation was how I could retain
a
Dan Trainor wrote:
Good morning -
I've not yet started using Bacula, but I'm getting ready to. I'm very
impressed with how it works, and the documentation is clear and concise
- even without having used bacula yet, I'm very impressed.
One thing that I did not see in t
Peter Eriksson wrote:
Hi List! :-)
I'm (again) trying to improve the performance of our Bacula installation.
Currently it takes approx 2 full days for a full recover to generate the
(in bacula-dir) incore tree of files to restore for a 360GB partition
which is kind of annoying (especially when
D Canfield wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but I would have assumed Maildir
to be *less* prone to consistency errors. I may not be able to say
"here's exactly what the server looked like at 11:59 on 5/23" but I
don't see how the backups would be invalid. I could see issues with
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Peter Eriksson wrote:
Hi List! :-)
I'm (again) trying to improve the performance of our Bacula
installation.
Currently it takes approx 2 full days for a full recover to generate the
(in bacula-dir) incore tree of files to restore for a 360GB partition
which is kind of anno
Michael Nelson wrote:
> The build blew up trying to build the gnome console, which I don't care
> about anyway. So, I turned that off in the spec file and the build
> completed, and the resultant rpms installed and work.
>
> But either that spec file is (or I am) not quite right.
>
> Michael
>
Hi -
Did some digging and I can't come up with much.
Long story short, I'm trying to come up with a (semi-) intelligent way
to back up MySQL binary logs.
I've made areal good progress with this project, but would be elated
if I could find a way to set and subsequently pass user-defined
variables
Hi -
I've spent the better part of a week here going through Bacula
documentation, going through the quick start, and acquainting myself
more with Bacula. I've known of Bacula for years now. I've tinkered
with it in the past, so for this latest project I had a considerable
head start than what I
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
>>> Why do we use volumes? It sounds like a silly question, but it's
>>> genuine. Is it so a backup can span several media types? Tape, file,
>>> disk, Pandora's box, what? Why do I care
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Jeff Cleverley
wrote:
> Dan,
>
> I'll throw in some general explanations of my own. Perhaps a
> different concept of things would help.
>
> Consider a garage to be a storage pool. Inside the garage are 100 1
> gallon buckets. The buckets are your volumes. You d
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:24 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> I ran a job, and it was blocked waiting for a volume to be mounted.
>> Why do I need to mount a volume? I had already set 'AutomaticMount =
>> yes;' for this Device. I suppose that only applies to Devices and not
>> volumes contained inside
17 matches
Mail list logo