Thank you for bringing this up, John, and thank you for reviewing the code,
Martin.
I have submitted a documentation bug report in the bacula gitlab.
Regards,
Robert Gerber
402-237-8692
r...@craeon.net
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 6:33 AM Martin Simmons wrote:
> According to the code, it also allow
I think there will no problem having one set of pools per FD, but maybe it
increases complexity for you. Otherwise, no space savings.
I have a couple ideas.
1. Bacula has the 'aligned' plugin. If you use the aligned plugin, it
attempts to better align blocks found on disk in the volumes. It does
According to the code, it also allows 6, 7 and 8:
case '6': /* compare XXHASH64 */
do_Digest = CRYPTO_DIGEST_XXHASH64;
break;
case '7': /* compare XXH3_64 */
do_Digest = CRYPTO_DIGEST_XXH3_64;
Hi Rob,
I understood well since our first exchange that the MaximumVolumes at 1
was a heresy. I also understood well that to best manage several
volumes, it remained important to separate Full, Diff and Inc in
different pools. So, we are returning substantially to what I already
have.
On the other
I had another idea. What if you try bacula progressive virtual full backups?
I do not know if you have heard of this method. You take a full backup,
then do incremental backups for a period of time, like one month. Then you
consolidate the previous full backup with the incremental backups. This
gi