Re: [Bacula-users] question about dbcheck (orphaned Path records)

2007-04-13 Thread Ralf Gross
Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > Is it possible that dbcheck loops for a much longer time without the > > modify flag enabled? > > Yes, I think there is a bug here. I would appreciate it if you would submit > a > bug report ... I'll open a bug report in the next couple of days. Thanks. Ralf ---

Re: [Bacula-users] question about dbcheck (orphaned Path records)

2007-04-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 13 April 2007 08:36, Ralf Gross wrote: > Ralf Gross schrieb: > > bacula-dir 2.0.3, bacula-sd 2.0.3, bacula-fd 2.0.2, debian etch amd64, > > postgres 8.1.7 > > > > I'm running dbcheck at the moment. The bacula postgres db is 1 GB. dbcheck > > needs very long time to check the orphaned Pat

Re: [Bacula-users] question about dbcheck (orphaned Path records)

2007-04-12 Thread Ralf Gross
Ralf Gross schrieb: > bacula-dir 2.0.3, bacula-sd 2.0.3, bacula-fd 2.0.2, debian etch amd64, > postgres 8.1.7 > > I'm running dbcheck at the moment. The bacula postgres db is 1 GB. dbcheck > needs very long time to check the orphaned Path entries. > > Checking for orphaned Path entries. This may