Re: [Bacula-users] packaging and -Bsymbolic_functions link option

2016-10-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
Bravo Carsten, I am really happy to hear that you test, which means that you never would have fallen into the Ubuntu traps (1. the -Bsymbolic ... 2. the new C++ bugs, which we have now programmed around by "fooling" the compiler.). Best regards, Kern On 10/04/2016 02:59 PM, Carsten Leonhardt

Re: [Bacula-users] packaging and -Bsymbolic_functions link option (was: bconsole can't talk to bacula-dir)

2016-10-04 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Kern Sibbald writes: > Yes, it is my understanding that Ubuntu (at least the Bacula packager) > is way ahead of Debian. While Debian stable still has the old 5.2.x release, it's quite easy to run a current version of Bacula using backports¹. Currently it's on 7.4.3 but I'll put 7.4.4 there sooni