On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 18:59 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I can't quite figure out the above sentence.
Ok, I'll try to rephrase.
My current spool size is 60gigs. My tape size is 100gigs uncompressed,
and my total backup job size for all my servers is roughly 350gigs.
When backups start, all my se
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 18:47, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 09:30 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Multiple jobs may simultaneously spool, but only one job despools at a
> > time all other jobs that are spooling continue spooling, all other jobs
> > that want to despool wait their t
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 09:30 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> Multiple jobs may simultaneously spool, but only one job despools at a time
> all other jobs that are spooling continue spooling, all other jobs that want
> to despool wait their turn.
This is only true if the spool is larger than all t
On Monday 22 August 2005 23:07, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I'm spooling data before it gets written to tape, and I run multiple
> jobs at the same time. My spool size is smaller than a single tape
> size, so I have to flush the spool pretty often. Because of this each
> tape can have a little bit of
