Re: [Bacula-users] bad interaction between IPV4/NAT and IPV6

2012-03-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:28:53 +0100 (CET), luc maisonobe said: > > I understand that when two addresses are available, a program has to guess > which one to use. > It would however be nice that in this case, a rejected connexion on the first > address tried would not interrupt everything but

Re: [Bacula-users] bad interaction between IPV4/NAT and IPV6

2012-03-13 Thread luc . maisonobe
Hi Josh, Thanks for your quick answer. - Mail original - > > On 3/13/2012 11:07 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > So before setting up internal names and internal DNS in addition to > > the > > external one, I considered using IPV6 only for my backups, since > > IPV6 > > does run perfectly on

Re: [Bacula-users] bad interaction between IPV4/NAT and IPV6

2012-03-13 Thread Josh Fisher
On 3/13/2012 11:07 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > So before setting up internal names and internal DNS in addition to the > external one, I considered using IPV6 only for my backups, since IPV6 > does run perfectly on my system. Each host can have its own address (or > even several ones if I wanted to