Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-13 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Thomas Glatthor > wrote: > > [...] > >>> Software Compression: 88.1 % >> have you ever tried without compression? > > well.. is true.. > when I configure jobs to use compression, the time is very superior > and rate (rate=tim

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-13 Thread Victor Hugo dos Santos
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Thomas Glatthor wrote: > [...] >>   Software Compression:   88.1 % > > have you ever tried without compression? well.. is true.. when I configure jobs to use compression, the time is very superior and rate (rate=time / MB, I belive) is slow. :-( before, I had

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-12 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Dan Langille wrote: > John Drescher wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Victor Hugo dos Santos >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Drescher wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote: >>> [...] >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-12 Thread Dan Langille
John Drescher wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Victor Hugo dos Santos > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Drescher wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos >>> wrote: >> [...] >> >>> This is expected for incremental backups because the hard drive

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-12 Thread Thomas Glatthor
Victor Hugo dos Santos schrieb: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Drescher wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos >> wrote: > > [...] > >> This is expected for incremental backups because the hard drive spends >> most of the time thrashing finding the files to

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-12 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Drescher wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos >> wrote: > > [...] > >> This is expected for incremental backups because the hard drive spends >> most of the time th

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-12 Thread Victor Hugo dos Santos
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have this network topology: >> - ~ 40 servers/clients >> - 1 director >> - 2 storages >> - all servers connect in Gigabits switches and GB network cards too.  :-) >> - all baculas (director an

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-12 Thread Victor Hugo dos Santos
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Drescher wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos > wrote: [...] > This is expected for incremental backups because the hard drive spends > most of the time thrashing finding the files to backup. However in > most cases even with the

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-11 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote: > Hello, > > I have this network topology: > - ~ 40 servers/clients > - 1 director > - 2 storages > - all servers connect in Gigabits switches and GB network cards too.  :-) > - all baculas (director and sotrages) and all linux servers

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula not use all bandwidth of network

2009-03-11 Thread Dan Langille
Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote: > Hello, > > I have this network topology: > - ~ 40 servers/clients > - 1 director > - 2 storages > - all servers connect in Gigabits switches and GB network cards too. :-) > - all baculas (director and sotrages) and all linux servers connect > with 2 network card in