Re: [Bacula-users] bacula Dedup not good working

2011-09-12 Thread Mehma Sarja
Well put Dan. Mehma === On 9/12/11 4:16 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > There are many possible reasons why people did not help. Don't take it > personally. > And certainly do not include sentences like the last one. > > > It is good of you to post the solution. Thank you. > --

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula Dedup not good working

2011-09-12 Thread Dan Langille
On Sep 12, 2011, at 6:03 AM, kollerholm wrote: > No one could help? that hurts. > i found the solution by myself. > thnak you for not helping me. There are many possible reasons why people did not help. Don't take it personally. And certainly do not include sentences like the last one. > for

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula Dedup not good working

2011-09-12 Thread Alan Brown
John Drescher wrote: >> No one could help? that hurts. >> i found the solution by miself. >> thnak you for not helping me. >> > > All I can say is that not everyone on this list uses that feature. Tradeoffs - MD5 checksumming of files is expensive both in terms of CPU and disk access, plus exten

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula Dedup not good working

2011-09-12 Thread John Drescher
> No one could help? that hurts. > i found the solution by miself. > thnak you for not helping me. > All I can say is that not everyone on this list uses that feature. John -- Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Vi