Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.1 rpm release

2009-06-14 Thread Scott Barninger
I'm not sure why Felix didn't upload them, however I've just become aware that the packages we did release do not work. There was a structural change in the source code that has caused a packaging problem which I will have fixed by the next release. In the meantime you can continue to use bat-2.

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.1 rpm release

2009-06-13 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi Devin, Devin Reade schrieb: > It doesn't appear that the bacula-bat RPMs are up on sourceforge in > the fschwarz directory as they were with previous releases. I'm assuming > that this is related to the qt problems described in April and May > on this list. Exactly. > Is there a plan to rele

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.1 rpm release

2009-06-13 Thread Devin Reade
Thank you very much for doing the work of making this release (in particular, the el5 release which I am using on CentOS 5). It doesn't appear that the bacula-bat RPMs are up on sourceforge in the fschwarz directory as they were with previous releases. I'm assuming that this is related to the qt

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.1 rpm release

2009-05-03 Thread Timo Neuvonen
"Scott Barninger" kirjoitti viestissä news:200905030813.37077.sc...@barninger.com... > Bacula-3.0 RPM Release Notes > 02 May 2009 > D. Scott Barninger > > > Release 3.0.1-1 > Seems to build nicely a binary rpm for CentOS 5.3 x86_64 / MySQL. And so does install too, the first test backup run did