Not sure if there is such a thing as "a standard bacula configuration", but
as I said, the simple math says that if you only do 1 monthly full backup
and you keep the last year's worth of full backups, you'll need 2.4TB of
storage. This completely ignores the retention of other backup levels.
On
It is a standard bacula configuration at present.
Most of the data will be static as its historic (up to 8 years old) copied
off a mac to a nfs mount and kept for the occasional random access from
other macs.
On 28 October 2015 at 09:51, Thing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is a standard bacula configurat
Hi,
It is a standard bacula configuration, data will also not change much. So
from your estimate with compression a 3TB drive would seem the minimum.
On 28 October 2015 at 09:14, John Lockard wrote:
> How often are you backing up? Fulls, Differentials, Incrementals? How
> long do you want to
How often are you backing up? Fulls, Differentials, Incrementals? How
long do you want to keep each? How compressible is your data? How much
does the data change? How often does the data change?
Too many variables to answer your questions as given.
Only full backups, once a month, you'd need
Cc: Arthur Emerson III
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 01:13, Arthur Emerson III wrote:
>
> Darien Hager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Are you reading from "Size:" or "Size on disk:"? If t
ana Corporation
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern
Sibbald
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:34 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Arthur Emerson III
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files
On Tuesday 03 April 200
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 01:13, Arthur Emerson III wrote:
>
> Darien Hager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Are you reading from "Size:" or "Size on disk:"? If there is a
> > significant difference between the two, then that may indicate the
> > presence of "sparse files", in which case you will
Darien Hager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you reading from "Size:" or "Size on disk:"? If there is a
> significant difference between the two, then that may indicate the
> presence of "sparse files", in which case you will want to set
> sparse=yes in your Fileset's Options{} block. It may al
On Mon, April 2, 2007 3:06 pm, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> Under unix/linux, getting the necessary information together would be
> rather simple, under windows I have no idea how I would do this.
Lots of clicking and rebooting, like everything else in Windows. ;-)
--
This message has been scanned
02, 2007 2:48 PM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files
>
> Hi,
>
> On 4/2/2007 11:38 PM, Raymond Luong wrote:
>> So you don't see anything wrong with my setup files or the job report?
>
> I ca
> I right click on the folders being backup on the windows 2003
> server and
> select properties. That gives me a combine size of the folders and
> it comes
> out to around 3.5g. How it comes out to be 6.9g during backup I do
> not know.
> I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this issue
gt; Mocana Corporation
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
> Lehmann
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:01 PM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than fil
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
> Lehmann
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:01 PM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files
>
> Hi,
>
> On 4/2/2
e.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files
Hi,
On 4/2/2007 10:46 PM, Raymond Luong wrote:
> I right click on the folders being backup on the windows 2003 server and
> select properties. That gives me a combine size of the folders and it
comes
> out to aroun
D] On Behalf Of Arno
> Lehmann
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:33 PM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files
>
> Hi,
>
> look:
>
> On 4/2/2007 8:34 PM, Raymond Luong wrote:
>> Hi
>>
&
hanks
Raymond Luong
IT Department
Mocana Corporation
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
Lehmann
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:33 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than file
Hi,
look:
On 4/2/2007 8:34 PM, Raymond Luong wrote:
> Hi
>
>... Here is the out put from a full backup of the
> windows 2003 server, which is name vega. The size of that job total 6.5g
^
> where as the data is only 3.5g. any
17 matches
Mail list logo
