Re: [Bacula-users] authorization errors after upgrade

2015-12-01 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hello Greg, Are you able to telnet between director and storage? Maybe this is a connection issue rather than authorization issues. Have you confirmed if your daemons are running (ports open with netstat)? Best regards, Ana On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Greg Woods wrote: > I am trying to u

Re: [Bacula-users] authorization errors

2008-12-08 Thread Alexandru Ionica
Hello again Daniel, It does seem to have effect. Since i changed the value from 30 sec to 10 minutes i didn't receive any more errors. If they don't appear in the following week then this might have been the problem though still i don't see a connection between the problem and the solution. Alexa

Re: [Bacula-users] authorization errors

2008-12-04 Thread Alexandru Ionica
Hello Daniel i have put it from 30 sec to 10 minutes Client Connect Wait = 10 minutes though i don't know why this should be a problem because from what i understand this value should be taken into account from the moment the job starts, and not while it's waiting in the queue. In the Bacula manu

Re: [Bacula-users] authorization errors

2008-12-04 Thread Daniel Betz
Hi Alexandru, try to add the following Line in you Storage ressource: Client Connect Wait = 18000 # or any other high value I have had the same problem and this line fixed it. Greetings, Daniel Betz Platform Engineer ___ domainfactory GmbH Oskar-Messter-Str.

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2 (Workaround)

2007-03-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Darien Hager wrote: > The prep job uses an empty fileset and runs the prep script *after* > the bulk of the job. If you make the prep job an "admin" job instead of an "archive" job you won't need to define an empty fileset. :) --

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2 (Workaround)

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, This is a nice solution to the problem, and something that you might want to keep indefinitely. However, the "problem" should be fixed in version 2.0.3. Regards, Kern On Friday 16 March 2007 19:45, Darien Hager wrote: > > On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:02, Jeronimo Zucco wrote: > > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2 (Workaround)

2007-03-16 Thread Darien Hager
> On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:02, Jeronimo Zucco wrote: > Someone pointed out how to modify the code recently on this list > (it involves > modifying the SD). > > Another approach would be to run a "dummy" job that does the > ClientRunBefore -- it could be a Verify with an empty FileSet. Th

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2

2007-02-01 Thread Jeronimo Zucco
Alan, thank you very much for your help. I built bacula from source, and I will try this. -- Jeronimo Zucco LPIC-1 Linux Professional Institute Certified Núcleo de Processamento de Dados Universidade de Caxias do Sul http://jczucco.blogspot.com Alan Davis escreveu: > >> ShivaJob.2007-02-0

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2

2007-02-01 Thread Alan Davis
> ShivaJob.2007-02-01_02.05.00 Fatal error: Socket error on Storage command: > ERR=No data available 01-Feb 03:12 bacula-dir: > ShivaJob.2007-02-01_02.05.00 > Error: Bacula 2.0.2 (28Jan07): 01-Feb-2007 03:12:11 This is the /real/ error and it does indicate that your RunBeforeJob is taking longe

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2

2007-02-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:02, Jeronimo Zucco wrote: > Kern Sibbald escreveu: > > If your RunBeforeScript runs more than 30 minutes (it is possible this is > > 20 minutes, I forget the exact delay), this will happen. Since the FD > > must connect to the SD within 30 minutes and the FD does no

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2

2007-02-01 Thread Jeronimo Zucco
Kern Sibbald escreveu: > If your RunBeforeScript runs more than 30 minutes (it is possible this is 20 > minutes, I forget the exact delay), this will happen. Since the FD must > connect to the SD within 30 minutes and the FD does not connect to the SD > until after the RunBeforeScript completes

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2

2007-02-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 February 2007 16:56, Jeronimo Zucco wrote: > Hi, list. > > I was using bacula-1.38.11, and then this week I upgraded to 2.0.2. > > I make backups for many servers using bacula without problems, but I > am receiving Authorization Errors when I run scripts before job, like

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors, or not?

2005-11-10 Thread TássiaCamõesAraújo
Yeah! This is the problem! What a stupid thing! It was just a matter at /hosts.allow and hosts.deny files... Thanks everyone for helping me! Tássia. Em 9/11/2005, "MaxxAtWork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: >I don't know if it's your case, but check that on the client >you have included the dir

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors, or not?

2005-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 01:41, TássiaCamõesAraújo wrote: > well, when I scan the ports of both servers I get the same answer: > > The server where everything is ok: > --- > maculele:~# nmap

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors, or not?

2005-11-09 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:41:12 -0300 (BRT), "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=E1ssia?= > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cam=F5es?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ara=FAjo?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Tássia> well, when I scan the ports of both servers I get the same answer: Tássia> The server where everything is ok: Tássi

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors, or not?

2005-11-08 Thread TássiaCamõesAraújo
well, when I scan the ports of both servers I get the same answer: The server where everything is ok: --- maculele:~# nmap localhost -p 9101,9102,9103 Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors, or not?

2005-11-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 20:16, TássiaCamõesAraújo wrote: > Hi Kern! > > I did what you advised me to do: > > When it works: > --- >- maculele:~# bconsole -d100 > Connecting to Director maculele:9

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors, or not?

2005-11-08 Thread TássiaCamõesAraújo
Hi Kern! I did what you advised me to do: When it works: maculele:~# bconsole -d100 Connecting to Director maculele:9101 bconsole: bnet.c:698 Current host[ipv4:192.168.0.1:9101] All host[ipv4

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors, or not?

2005-11-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
Set debug to 100 (-d100) on both ends. The debug messages will give more details about what is going on ... On Monday 07 November 2005 21:20, TássiaCamõesAraújo wrote: > Hi all, > > About 10 days ago I wrote a message saying that I had some > "Authorization Errors" going on, but I didn't have an

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors

2005-10-25 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 25.10.2005 06:38, TássiaCamõesAraújo wrote: Hi all, I've been using bacula for months and I didn't have anything to complain about. But last week I had a problem with a new client I'd like to backup, and I really don't know waht to do. I guess we don't, too, because that isn't much