Hello,
2011/5/31 Geert Stappers
> > > >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > No.
> > > >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> } } }} } And a backup tool should never ever delete files.
>
Well, you try to avoid a dangerous situation, but almost all existing
Op 20110530 om 10:41 schreef Konstantin Khomoutov:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:06 +0200 Jérôme Blion wrote:
> > >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> > >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> > >> > >
> > >> > No.
> > >> Not yet... :)
> > > IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'R
On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:41:38 +0200
Jérôme Blion wrote:
> >> >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> >> >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > No.
> >> >> Not yet... :)
> >> > IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'RunAfterJob'
> >> That's not true. An archive f
On Mon, 30 May 2011 12:41:14 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:06 +0200
> Jérôme Blion wrote:
>
>> >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
>> >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
>> >> > >
>> >> > No.
>> >> Not yet... :)
>> > IMNSHO it allready exists, i
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:06 +0200
Jérôme Blion wrote:
> >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> >> > >
> >> > No.
> >> Not yet... :)
> > IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'RunAfterJob'
> That's not true. An archive function would only de
Il 27/05/2011 16:32, Robert Kromoser ha scritto:
> Hi folks.
>
> Does exist any archive function in bacula.
>
> What do I mean?
>
> On a Backup the backed up data from a Fileset will stay on the
> filesystem after the backup.
>
> With an archive function the backed up data from the Fileset will be
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:05:21 +0200, Geert Stappers
wrote:
> Op 20110527 om 20:44 schreef Radosław Korzeniewski:
>> 2011/5/27 John Drescher
>> > 2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
>> > > [ delete files after backup ]
>> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
>> > >
>> > No.
>>
>> Not yet... :
Op 20110527 om 20:44 schreef Radosław Korzeniewski:
> 2011/5/27 John Drescher
> > 2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> > >
> > No.
>
> Not yet... :)
IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'RunAfterJob'
Stappers
--
Hello,
2011/5/27 John Drescher
> 2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
> >
> > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> >
> No.
>
>
Not yet... :)
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
vRanger
2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
> Hi folks.
>
>
>
> Does exist any archive function in bacula.
>
> What do I mean?
>
>
>
> On a Backup the backed up data from a Fileset will stay on the filesystem
> after the backup.
>
> With an archive function the backed up data from the Fileset will be removed
> fro
> 13-May 15:37 CBCK0001-dir JobId 4: Start Backup JobId 4,
> Job=CCRM0004_01_Backup_Full.2011-05-13_15.37.39_03
> 13-May 15:37 CBCK0001-dir JobId 4: Using Device "SugarCRM_CCRM0004_Full"
> 13-May 14:31 CCRM0004-fd JobId 4: Warning: bsock.c:128 Could not connect
> to Storage daemon on CBCK0001:9103.
2011/5/13 Robert Kromoser :
> Hi Everybody.
>
>
>
> I installed a new bacula 5.0.3 server on CentOS 5.5.
>
> In my configuration I use only disk backups.
>
> When I start a backup with bconsole run command, the volumes will be created
> in the catalog
>
> but won’t be created on the filesystem and
> Does the bacula user have write access to your storage location on
> your filesystem? That is assuming bacula-sd is running as user bacula
> like it does on many linux operating systems.
>
Also what do the messages say in the bacula console?
The output of
status dir
status st
and status clie
> Thomas Wakefield wrote:
>>
> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
> write 2 copies to tape for redundancy.
> ..
Thomas Wakefield wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 12, 2010, at 9:43 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
needed, we could pull the copy b
Thanks for all the answers. Basically it sounds like bacula doesn't have
anything for native archive support which is what i expected. So i will do
something along the lines of what everyone else does.
On Jan 12, 2010, at 9:43 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>>> Take a
> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
>> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
>> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
>> write 2 copies to tape for redundancy.
>>
>> I already u
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Stuart McGraw wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 12:46 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
>> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>>> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
>>> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
>>> needed, we could pull
On 01/12/2010 12:46 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
>> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
>> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
>> write 2 copies
Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
> write 2 copies to tape for redundancy.
>
> I already use bacu
Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly 5-10
years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if needed, we could
pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly write 2 copies to tape for
redundancy.
I already use bacula to protect over 100TB of spinnin
Thomas Wakefield wrote:
> Is there any support in Bacula for doing archiving? I have some data i want
> to offload to tape, and i am wondering if bacula can help.
What do you consider archiving to be? As opposed to backup?
In short, what are your expectations?
Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>>
>>
No need to delete the volumes from the catalog... just set their
status to something unusable... or, preferrably, disable them.
>>> Am I sure that bacula wont use a disabled "Full-run" as basis for a
>>> subsequent Incr
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>
>
>>> No need to delete the volumes from the catalog... just set their
>>> status to something unusable... or, preferrably, disable them.
>>
>> Am I sure that bacula wont use a disabled "Full-run" as basis for a
>> subsequent Incremental run?
>
> It wil
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> > No need to delete the volumes from the catalog... just set their
> > status to something unusable... or, preferrably, disable them.
>
> Am I sure that bacula wont use a disabled "Full-run" as basis for a
> subsequent Incremental run?
It will, but just
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> 14.02.2008 10:53, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> We'd like to send some tapes every now and then to an external archive.
>> And make sure that doing a subsequent restore, bacula would think these
>> tapes are "gone", since the amount of work getting them back is generally
>> only for
Hi,
14.02.2008 10:53, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We'd like to send some tapes every now and then to an external archive.
> And make sure that doing a subsequent restore, bacula would think these
> tapes are "gone", since the amount of work getting them back is generally
> only for emergency si
>> Is there a script somewhere that takes a "volumename" and give me a
>> "tar
>> tvf-like" output of the complete volume content?
>
> 'bls' and 'bextract' will let you work directly with volumes.
Sorry.. I should have mentionend. It was my intention just to extract it
from the DB before removing
Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We'd like to send some tapes every now and then to an external archive.
> And make sure that doing a subsequent restore, bacula would think these
> tapes are "gone", since the amount of work getting them back is generally
> only for emergency situations.
>
> So I can
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 09:04 +0200, pieter claassen wrote:
>
> My questions:
> 1. Below is the debug info. How do I determine why the device is not
> visible to bacula? What could be going on here?
What does "status dir" show? Status storage?
Run:
$ sudo bacula-sd -f -d 2>&1 | tee /var/tmp
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Mike wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Michael Brennen might have said:
>
>> My question is this: will Bacula job migration allow the sort of
>> split use that I am doing for the unix systems? That is, will it
>> be possible, once a full transfer is done, to always do an
>> in
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Matt Cowger wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Michael Brennen wrote:
>>
>> Said another way, I do not see that a job can mount a Bacula disk
>> archive as a client file set to then spin to tape.
>
> This could be possible using a 'RunBeforeJob' script that would
> loop
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Michael Brennen might have said:
>
> For several years I have been doing my own D2D2T scheme based on
> rsync/tar. I have a large capacity disk system in the office that
> archives systems with rsync across a T1 to the colo cabinets. That is
> where rsync really is usefu
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Michael Brennen wrote:
>
> Said another way, I do not see that a job can mount a Bacula disk
> archive as a client file set to then spin to tape.
This could be possible using a 'RunBeforeJob' script that would
loopback mount the disk archive, run the backup with
Will L (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ps: yes it is not really the place for this question but this
> question
> is too avoid to post somethings that could be solved few month
> ago. Is
> it some way to do a search query to the mail archive?
>
> Tr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps: yes it is not really the place for this question but this question
is too avoid to post somethings that could be solved few month ago. Is
it some way to do a search query to the mail archive?
Try Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Bacula-f14014.html - you can search both
Hello,
On 1/4/2006 1:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I use bacula 1.36.2 installed with the debian/sarge packages
I have this pool:
Pool {
Name = PascalPool
Pool Type = Backup
AutoPrune = yes
# Use Volume Once = yes
Recycle = yes
Label Format = "Volume-"
Volume Retention = 10 d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Maximun Volume Jobs = 1
--^ m
> Maximun Volumes = 10
--^ m
> Accept Any Volume = no
> }
> and when i start the director i obtain:
> Config error: Keyword "MaximunVolumeJobs" not permitted in this resource.
> Perhaps you left the tr
38 matches
Mail list logo
