Re: [Bacula-users] Using "Volume Use Duration"

2005-09-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 08 September 2005 21:33, Arno Lehmann wrote: ... > > I found that bacula does this quite well, > although things like temporary off-site storage need intervention. If you or anyone else has any practical suggestions for improving this Archive (off-site) storage problem, please let m

Re: [Bacula-users] Using "Volume Use Duration"

2005-09-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 08 September 2005 21:12, Tom Boyda wrote: > Hello, > ... > > I just need to get a handle on how bacula wants to work and make my > schedule fit around bacula so that bacula will handle tape rotation and > recycling by itself with the least amount of intervention on my part or > the oper

Re: [Bacula-users] Using "Volume Use Duration"

2005-09-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, Tom Boyda wrote: Looking into upgrading - will I be required to upgrade my windows clients from 1.37.32 to be able to use 1.37.38 director and storage daemon? I *think* not: #ver goblin-dir Version: 1.37.38 (04 September 2005) #status client=ork-fd Connecting to Client ork-fd at ork:9102

Re: [Bacula-users] Using "Volume Use Duration"

2005-09-08 Thread Tom Boyda
Hello, Tom Boyda wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am using bacula 1.37.30 on a Solaris 9 system with a mysql db backend. >You should consider upgrading to 1.37.38 - I think there are some >serious improvements. Looking into upgrading - will I be required to upgrade my windows clients from 1.37.32 to

Re: [Bacula-users] Using "Volume Use Duration"

2005-09-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, Tom Boyda wrote: Hello, I am using bacula 1.37.30 on a Solaris 9 system with a mysql db backend. You should consider upgrading to 1.37.38 - I think there are some serious improvements. I have set my monthly pools to have "Volume Use Duration" of 3 days. Three days was an arbitrary