:
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4
>>>>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:05:00 +, ted said:
>
> I have a quick question about a Bacula upgrade to Bacula 9.0.4. I have a
> Bacula direc
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula
9.0.4
>>>>>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17
-
> *From:* Martin Simmons
> *Sent:* Friday, October 27, 2017 1:27:45 AM
> *To:* bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4
>
> >>>>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:05:00 +, ted said:
> >
>
ula 9.
Thanks, again for providing some direction for this upgrade.
Ted
From: Martin Simmons
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 1:27:45 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4
>>>>> On
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:05:00 +, ted said:
>
> I have a quick question about a Bacula upgrade to Bacula 9.0.4. I have a
> Bacula director, and a number of storage units at 7.0.4 running on a BSD
> server with postgres for the Bacula database. My question is can Bacula 9 be
> run inline w
Hi,
An extract of Release 9.0.0,
"Compatibility:
–
As always, both the Community Director and Storage daemon(s) must be
upgraded
at the same time. Any File daemon running on the same machine as a Director
or Storage daemon must be of the same version."
Le 26/10/2017 à 19:05, ted a écri
