Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3)

2007-05-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
ssage- > From: John Drescher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:52 PM > To: Petcher, Daniel; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( > LTO3) > >> That sounds reasonable. Let m

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T( LTO3)

2007-04-29 Thread Michel Meyers
Hello, On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:42:38 -0700, "Petcher, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That sounds reasonable. Let me probe around to find which device number the > This error message takes about a minute to appear (/dev/nst0 behaves the > same way): > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mtx -f /dev/st0 inq

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3)

2007-04-27 Thread Petcher, Daniel
users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3) After editing my bacula-*.conf files, I get this same error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bacula/bin# ./btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/st0 Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes. btape: butil.c:286 Using d

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3)

2007-04-27 Thread Michael Nelson
Petcher, Daniel wrote: After editing my bacula-*.conf files, I get this same error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bacula/bin# ./btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/st0 Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes. btape: butil.c:286 Using device: "/dev/st0" for writing. 27-Apr 16:20 btape: 3301 Issuing autochanger "loa

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3)

2007-04-27 Thread Petcher, Daniel
. Density code 0x0 (default). Soft error count since last status=0 General status bits on (5): DR_OPEN IM_REP_EN -dP -Original Message- From: John Drescher [spam-blokced] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:52 PM To: Petcher, Daniel; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-u

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3)

2007-04-27 Thread Petcher, Daniel
-Original Message- From: John Drescher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:52 PM To: Petcher, Daniel; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3) > That sounds reasonable. Let me probe around

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3)

2007-04-27 Thread John Drescher
> That sounds reasonable. Let me probe around to find which device number the > tape responds to. It appears on different numbers because I have a huge > removable SCSI volume that enumerates earlier than the tape drive and > changer in the /dev/sg(x) list if it happens to be mounted today. If I le

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T ( LTO3)

2007-04-27 Thread Petcher, Daniel
--Original Message- From: Michael Nelson [spam-protected] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:52 PM To: Petcher, Daniel Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T (LTO3) When you want to access the autochanger, you talk to /dev/sg3.

Re: [Bacula-users] Two problems talking to Dell PowerVault 124T (LTO3)

2007-04-27 Thread Michael Nelson
When you want to access the autochanger, you talk to /dev/sg3. When you want to talk to the tape drive (as in using btape) you want to pass it the drive device, ie: /dev/nst0. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --