Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error

2007-03-30 Thread Robert Nelson
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Debelius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 11:11 AM > To: Robert Nelson > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error > > Well, I know tha

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error

2007-03-30 Thread Brian Debelius
Well, I know tha Nawfel had this problem with his Ultrium. I have an Exabyte VXA-172, which is a firmware crippled VXA-320, and I have this problem also. Yes this is a Windows installation. Director, sd, and fd on one box. Ahh, so you are saying that Maximum Volume Bytes, is the count of byt

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error

2007-03-30 Thread Robert Nelson
Brian, Are you also seeing this on Windows? If so it is quite possible that I have a bug in the Windows emulation of the UNIX tape IOCTLs. I've ordered an Ultrium 232 drive to do further testing on both Windows and Linux. If there is anything we can do to fix this in Bacula I should have a fix

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error

2007-03-30 Thread Jason King
Yes, use the "maximum volume bytes" directive to limit the amount of data stored to a tape. Once bacula sees that much data has been written, it should label the volume as "full" and ask you for the next tape in the pool. Jason Brian Debelius wrote: > Brian Debelius wrote: > >> Is there a w

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error

2007-03-30 Thread Brian Debelius
Brian Debelius wrote: > Is there a way I can work around the end of tape MTWEOF error by telling > bacula to limit the amount of data written to the tape? Lets say I have > an 80GB tape. Is there a way to tell bacula to only write 75 or 70GB > and then start a new tape? > > My next thought is,