On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 11:46 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> No, and given the difficulties in dealing with tapes, this is probably not
> something I am going to try. First, there should not be any failed jobs.
> Second, I think this kind of problem will probably be best dealt with by
> "merging" t
On Sunday 14 August 2005 21:23, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 August 2005 04:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> >>Kern,
> >>This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
> >>in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Sunday 14 August 2005 04:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>>Kern,
>>This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
>>in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
>>erase that job from the tape and treat that portion of the t
On Sunday 14 August 2005 04:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Kern,
> This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
> in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
> erase that job from the tape and treat that portion of the tape as
> unused? Logic s
