[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michael Brennen wrote:
>
> > That's what I get for working with things I don't fully
> understand. :)
>
> Heh... "working with things I don't fully understand" is the story of
> my life.
That's it that's just Brilliant
That is the precise inscription I want on my
Michael Brennen wrote:
> That's what I get for working with things I don't fully understand. :)
Heh... "working with things I don't fully understand" is the story of my
life.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
---
On Thursday 01 March 2007 03:58, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 February 2007 09:42, Michael Brennen wrote:
> >> Hello again,
> >>
> >> The long weekend backups started running Friday night. This is a 4
> >> drive 60 slot autochanger. The bacula
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 26 February 2007 03:17, Michael Brennen wrote:
>> I have a resolution to the mount problems of which I wrote last
>> night, in which bacula attempts to unload a phantom tape from an
>> empty drive before loading the needed tape. I went back to
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Sunday 25 February 2007 09:42, Michael Brennen wrote:
>> Hello again,
>>
>> The long weekend backups started running Friday night. This is a 4
>> drive 60 slot autochanger. The bacula version is "archive-dir
>> Version: 2.1.4 (21 February 2007)" to g
On Monday 26 February 2007 03:17, Michael Brennen wrote:
> I have a resolution to the mount problems of which I wrote last
> night, in which bacula attempts to unload a phantom tape from an
> empty drive before loading the needed tape. I went back to the
> latest released source, 2.0.2, and all is
On Sunday 25 February 2007 09:42, Michael Brennen wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> The long weekend backups started running Friday night. This is a 4
> drive 60 slot autochanger. The bacula version is "archive-dir
> Version: 2.1.4 (21 February 2007)" to get the encryption patch.
>
> Consistent with what