On 5. apr. 2011, at 09.06, Tor Willy Austerslått wrote:
> On 5. apr. 2011, at 07.19, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>
>>> Last week we began having problems backing up one particular server. It's a
>>> terminal server with (almost) the exact same contents as servers that backs
>>> up just fine. The bac
On 5. apr. 2011, at 07.19, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>> Last week we began having problems backing up one particular server. It's a
>> terminal server with (almost) the exact same contents as servers that backs
>> up just fine. The backup doesn't even start, but bombs out with "Fatal
>> error: Soc
On 5. apr. 2011, at 05.40, Mehma Sarja wrote:
> That is a nice name! It could be a file name. It is good that it backs
> up one file, how about one directory?
>
> Mehma
Thanks ;)
Yes, if I expand the dummy fileset with a couple of directories, it works. If I
use the example fileset verbatim, n
On 04/04/2011 11:25 PM, Tor Willy Austerslått wrote:
> Hello all.
> We run Bacula fd, sd and dir 5.0.3 on a single Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server in a
> blade center and are (among other things) backing up several Windows Server
> 2003 x64 servers with it. All the x64 filedaemons are version 5.0.3 x64 V
On 4/4/11 2:25 PM, Tor Willy Austerslått wrote:
> In short: I can't for the life of me see what could be wrong. Anyone have any
> useful pointers with regard to where to start looking?
Tor Willy,
That is a nice name! It could be a file name. It is good that it backs
up one file, how about one di
