Smaller jobs might help, but I would like to keep the simplicity of just
being able to throw a new client at Bacula and know that it is getting
backed up, without having to delve too deep (initially) into what
filesystems are on that client.
Thanks all for the feedback.
regards, Phil
Phil Webe
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 02.01.2008 16:53,, Weber, Philip wrote::
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Bacula 2.2.4. Solaris 9 Director & Storage Daemons. Mix of Solaris and
>> Windows clients.
>>
>> I am gradually moving some backups onto Bacula (from another backup
>> system) & have noticed that Spoolin
Hi,
02.01.2008 16:53,, Weber, Philip wrote::
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Bacula 2.2.4. Solaris 9 Director & Storage Daemons. Mix of Solaris and
> Windows clients.
>
> I am gradually moving some backups onto Bacula (from another backup
> system) & have noticed that Spooling of backups does not appear
> 1. Would I be better off using migration instead of spooling? e.g. back up
> everything to disk overnight and then later migrate to tape. I am probably
> OK for disk space, and my main aims are to get backups through as quickly as
> possible and prevent my LTO2 drives from shoe-shining.
>
I hav
